🚀 go-pugleaf

rbwinn wrote:
> On Jul 6, 8:59�pm, Free Lunch <lu...@nofreelunch.us> wrote:
>> On Sun, 6 Jul 2008 20:53:52 -0700 (PDT), "Dogmantic Pyrrhonist (AKA Al)"
>> <alwh...@optusnet.com.au> wrote in alt.atheism:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Jul 7, 9:25 am, Free Lunch <lu...@nofreelunch.us> wrote:
>>>> On Sun, 6 Jul 2008 23:46:07 +0100, "Steve O" <nospamh...@thanks.com>
>>>> wrote in alt.atheism:
>>>>> "rbwinn" <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote in message
>>>>> news:8b1223f1-9281-4b80-9157-b3b335a16970@34g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
>>>>>> I don't have to be familiar with Satan to know that a plot to betray
>>>>>> Jesus Christ came from him, not God.
>>>>>> Robert B. Winn
>>>>> So are you saying that the crucifixion was the work of Satan, and that
>>>>> Christ should never have been sacrificed?
>>>>> Kind of creates a little problem with your theology, don't you think?
>>>> Remember that the theology of Christianity tells us that God is a
>>>> sociopath.
>>> I always thought she was a frustrated paranoid scitzo megolomaniac
>>> with a serious inferiority complex and tendencies towards manic-
>>> depression.
>> Okay, but that leads to sociopathic behavior. Lucky for religionists,
>> God doesn't exist, since the stories about God tell us that God was
>> responsible for more deaths than Stalin, Hitler and Mao combined.
>>
>>> The hypothetic god thing isn't human, so there's no
>>> reason it should see humans as "people", so the sociopath diagnosis is
>>> no more valid than for a tiger that kills someone.
>> More like a person who collects kittens to drown them.- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
> 
> Well, all you are doing is saying that God is guilty of murder every
> time a natural death occurs.  I do not think you will get far with
> that idea.

Why not?