Re: Twins Paradox Resolved

Article View: sci.physics

Article #1378

#1378

From: Mcinnes B T (Dr)
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 1992 05:09

4 lines
567 bytes

John Baez: What, more reticence? I'm sure I speak for many when I say
that I would be very interested to hear about those 3 hours of debate on
the twins. Please post a summary. Thanks rett 
c

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1992Jul23.050957.6557@nuscc.nus.sg>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!darwin.sura.net!jvnc.net!nuscc!matmcinn

References: <1992Jul22.153702.25130@galois.mit.edu>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Newsgroups: sci.physics
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!darwin.sura.net!jvnc.net!nuscc!matmcinn
From: matmcinn@nuscc.nus.sg (Mcinnes B T (Dr))
Subject: Re: Twins Paradox Resolved
Message-ID: <1992Jul23.050957.6557@nuscc.nus.sg>
Organization: National University of Singapore
References: <1992Jul22.153702.25130@galois.mit.edu>
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 1992 05:09:57 GMT
Lines: 4

Reply to Parent Message