Article View: sci.physics
Article #14206Re: Does God need to prove He exists?
From: hhyapster
Date: Fri, 04 Jul 2008 01:35
Date: Fri, 04 Jul 2008 01:35
185 lines
9541 bytes
9541 bytes
On Jul 3, 9:42 pm, rbwinn <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote: > On Jul 3, 4:52 am, The Natural Philosopher <a...@b.c> wrote: > > > > > rbwinn wrote: > > > On Jul 3, 4:08�am, The Natural Philosopher <a...@b.c> wrote: > > >> Steve O wrote: > > > >>> "BuddyThunder" <nos...@paradise.net.nz> wrote in message > > >>>news:486c4bcc$1@clear.net.nz... > > >>>> rbwinn wrote: > > >>>>> God has eternal life, something atheists do not believe in and do not > > >>>>> want. �The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints teaches that > > >>>>> members will inherit all that the Father hath if they are faithful, > > >>>>> which means that members of the church will also inherit eternal > > >>>>> life. �So members of the church can become like God, something that > > >>>>> was commanded also in the New Testament. � Be ye therefore perfect, > > >>>>> even as your Father which is in Heaven is perfect. �So there is > > >>>>> nothing new in any of these doctrines. �They were taught by Jesus > > >>>>> Christ in his lifetime. > > >>>> We would probably want it if it could be shown to be anything other > > >>>> than wishful thinking. > > >>> I wouldn't want it at all. > > >>> What the hell are going to do on your > > >>> 1000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,00�0,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,0�00,000,000,000,000th > > >>> day in eternity that you haven't already done a million times already? > > >>> Good grief, you'd be bored shitless, if not driven insane by the sheer, > > >>> mind-numbing boredom. > > >> Ah, but its eternity. It's timeless. > > > >> Actually this stuff all makes perfect sense to me, but not in the > > >> context of a supernatural being..unless you want to call the Universe such. > > > >> The original philosophers and shamans who tried to describe the world > > >> were not stupid: they just lacked the vocabulary. > > > >> For stupidity, you have to come down past the political religions like > > >> Christianity, to the mere followers like our Robbo, who hasn't really > > >> got a clue about the philosophy and mysticism that underlies the belief > > >> set and worldview he so desperately clings to. > > > >> Religious texts are well worthy of study as long as you throw away the > > >> interpretations of *churches*. > > > >> I've skimmed most of the worlds esoteric knowledge base..I eschewed > > >> Christianity because it was so blatantly stupid, until last. Then I > > >> found that it had much in common with other world religions: There is in > > >> all a basic structure that pertains to something. Its just that > > >> Christianity, and Islam, have both overlaid it with a huge amount of > > >> utter rubbish that they insist is the pure literal truth. > > > >> You will get a far more interesting slant on religion from an atheist: > > >> who may have actually stuidied the subject dispassionately: with a > > >> Christian or Muslim (excluding the Dervish movement) its a package deal, > > >> by and large, Buy it or not. There is no room for understanding: Just FAITH. > > > >> But Faith is just a small tool on one step of a ladder of understanding. > > >> Not the be all and end all of it. > > > >> Its like science, where people want to be told 'whatever is the case' > > >> (Wittgenstein). The truth is no one knows. We are also operating in > > >> ultimate ignorance, using a set of rules and tools that produce results, > > >> without any real confirmation that those rules and tools have any real > > >> correlation with the underlying reality (if indeed there is such) of the > > >> universe. > > > >> It gets worse. Largely reality is *what you think it is* because so much > > >> of it is interpreted into your worldview and belief system: enough so > > >> that an Epiphany CAN totally change someones subjective life: that > > >> little trick is traded on by every priest there ever has been..to > > >> demonstrate the reality of their particular brand of snake oil. > > > >> I can levitate certain objects. Sounds impressive, and so it would be to > > >> a stone age man. You would instantly spot the remote control devices in > > >> my hand...;-) HOWEVER I could in principle use that as the basis of a > > >> system to impress hunter gatherers that I had direct access to whatever > > >> power they believed existed already, and thereby create a religion and > > >> my own position in it. > > > >> Its been done so many times.. > > > >> Don't throw out babies with bathwater: Religious material has matter of > > >> interest. Just bypass the interpretations of the Faithful, and make up > > >> your own mind. > > > >> Eternity is a state of mind in which the faculty to organise things in > > >> an event stream is not operating. You can by one or more of various > > >> approaches experience this yourself. To the practitioner this leads to a > > >> possible conclusions that time itself is a anthropocentric issue: it is > > >> not an absolute. Remove life, and you remove time. Ergo after death > > >> there is eternity. �In a sense. > > > >> Or to say it in another way, the totality of the experience of life can > > >> be transformed via something akin to �Fourier transform, in which the > > >> time element is transmuted into a position in some other dimension > > >> somewhat like 'frequency' or 'colour'. .. a co-ordinate system that > > >> encapsulates the totality of a lifetime as a single pattern in which the > > >> time element is not present in terms of linear progression of events. > > > >> We don't normally operate in that mode: but many people will assure you > > >> that we CAN. "my whole life passed before my eyes in an instant" says > > >> the drowning man..its from experiences such as this that the concepts of > > >> the old shamans were born, transmuted and corrupted by years of > > >> translation and repetition into the utter garbage you find in the Bible.- Hide quoted text - > > > >> - Show quoted text - > > > > I think that Jesus Christ would be the best one to explain your idea > > > to. > > > I don't have to. He knew all about it already, and tried to explain, > > sadly no one really was listening. So they hung him on a cross to shut > > him up. > > > But having studied in the East, he knew how to go into ultra deep > > meditation, so he looked dead enough to be cut down, and with the help > > of his girlfriend, managed to stay alive long enough to have rampant sex > > and a few babies. > > > Some of which is documented in the testaments the Romans left OUT of the > > bible. > > > > Robert B. Winn- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text - > > The Gnostiocs wrote a bunch of garbage about their theory that Jesus > Christ did not suffer or die on the cross because he was a God. They > were trying to combine Christianity with Greek mythology. > Robert B. Winn Greek myths are borrowed from Christianity stories. They are the same thing.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<c87233d9-0458-4316-a7e8-382b377a6832@j1g2000prb.googlegroups.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!j1g2000prb.googlegroups.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<48581d68$1@clear.net.nz> <6ct363F3j04liU1@mid.individual.net> <e3d0ccee-439a-44db-a265-ba7b9783e15e@u6g2000prc.googlegroups.com> <6ctgpeF3i3djpU1@mid.individual.net> <c2a5e92f-3697-40de-ba73-7aa8b42d6e48@p25g2000hsf.googlegroups.com> <6cuh4dF3houn9U1@mid.individual.net> <348e1c43-660e-47e1-a05f-d01e45fed2c3@e53g2000hsa.googlegroups.com> <6cvhj7F3a89U1@mid.individual.net> <b9c4c4a2-ed86-4b04-b8a8-96c31e5d0076@y21g2000hsf.googlegroups.com> <6d25suFg1imU1@mid.individual.net> <d0006342-ae9e-4491-937f-762ecf238699@k13g2000hse.googlegroups.com> <486c4bcc$1@clear.net.nz> <6d35k3Fjp5bU1@mid.individual.net> <1215083338.19681.0@proxy00.news.clara.net> <3ff65f37-3318-4efa-9280-69bb83c72385@c58g2000hsc.googlegroups.com> <1215085979.4877.0@proxy02.news.clara.net> <93dde3ad-a17a-421e-b5d9-f5f2f590f84d@p25g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 10b271,d932fee6d9806ab9 X-Google-Thread: 102f53,dac8026861d35fee X-Google-Thread: f442a,d932fee6d9806ab9 X-Google-Thread: 116469,d932fee6d9806ab9 X-Google-Attributes: gid10b271,gid102f53,gidf442a,gid116469,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,UTF8 Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!j1g2000prb.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: hhyapster@gmail.com Newsgroups: sci.physics,cam.misc,alt.sci.physics,alt.atheism Subject: Re: Does God need to prove He exists? Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2008 18:35:23 -0700 (PDT) Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 185 Message-ID: <c87233d9-0458-4316-a7e8-382b377a6832@j1g2000prb.googlegroups.com> References: <48581d68$1@clear.net.nz> <6ct363F3j04liU1@mid.individual.net> <e3d0ccee-439a-44db-a265-ba7b9783e15e@u6g2000prc.googlegroups.com> <6ctgpeF3i3djpU1@mid.individual.net> <c2a5e92f-3697-40de-ba73-7aa8b42d6e48@p25g2000hsf.googlegroups.com> <6cuh4dF3houn9U1@mid.individual.net> <348e1c43-660e-47e1-a05f-d01e45fed2c3@e53g2000hsa.googlegroups.com> <6cvhj7F3a89U1@mid.individual.net> <b9c4c4a2-ed86-4b04-b8a8-96c31e5d0076@y21g2000hsf.googlegroups.com> <6d25suFg1imU1@mid.individual.net> <d0006342-ae9e-4491-937f-762ecf238699@k13g2000hse.googlegroups.com> <486c4bcc$1@clear.net.nz> <6d35k3Fjp5bU1@mid.individual.net> <1215083338.19681.0@proxy00.news.clara.net> <3ff65f37-3318-4efa-9280-69bb83c72385@c58g2000hsc.googlegroups.com> <1215085979.4877.0@proxy02.news.clara.net> <93dde3ad-a17a-421e-b5d9-f5f2f590f84d@p25g2000hsf.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 58.10.27.207 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1215135323 18023 127.0.0.1 (4 Jul 2008 01:35:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2008 01:35:23 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: j1g2000prb.googlegroups.com; posting-host=58.10.27.207; posting-account=NPLTlAoAAADnbGreKf-CrqgPY_0uVbLS User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.15) Gecko/20080623 Firefox/2.0.0.15,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)