🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: sci.physics
Article #14355

Re: Does God need to prove He exists?

#14355
From: rbwinn
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 02:05
60 lines
4569 bytes
On Jun 26, 1:09�pm, The Natural Philosopher <a...@b.c> wrote:
> W.A. Sawford wrote:
> > On Thu, 26 Jun 2008, rbwinn wrote:
>
> >> On Jun 26, 5:05� am, RobertL <robertml...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >>> On Jun 26, 4:48� am, rbwinn <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote:
>
> >>>> On Jun 25, 7:27�pm, "Smiler" <Smi...@Joe.King.com> wrote:
> >> Well, if no one proved it, then it was not proven. � All you have done
> >> is to say it was proven without showing any proof or anyone who is
> >> suppsed to have done it. �Atheists have said they have proven all
> >> manner of things. �Almost always it turns out to be something some
> >> individual atheist put together that sounds good to other atheists.
> >> Robert B. Winn
>
> > I wasn't going to get involved in all this (unless it's Friday, which it
> > isn't) but I can't stand it any longer (sigh).
>
> > 'Atheists have said they have proven all manner of things.'
>
> > Well, what exactly have they claimed to have proved, and which atheists
> > have claimed it? �Atheists don't actually need to 'prove' anything,
> > because there is not a shred of evidence that god exists in the first
> > place. The onus is not on atheists to prove the non-existence of god any
> > more than the non-existence of the ravening bug-blatter beast of Traal.
>
> Completely wrong. The concept of God is not a scientific hypotheis, nor
> a fact.
>
> So it can't be proven or disproven.
>
> Its simply a shorthand for 'all the wide and wonderful stuff we cant get
> a handle on; and feel scared by' more or less.
>
> Atheism isn't so much denying His existence, nor yet keeping and open
> mind on the subject (agnostic) its merely sidestepping the whole mess as
> something one can simply do without.
>
> > Show me some real evidence and I'll think about belief. Although actual
> > evidence would of course remove the need for belief in the first place...
>
> That's the whole point. Belief is a state of mind that has utility. Its
> a little bit of Wise-ardry. Headology.
>
> Wise-ards understand that believing in something is an action, not a
> statement about its existence, or lack thereof.
>
>
>
> > Wendy- Hide quoted text -
>
Well, what atheists do not like to discuss is Jesus Christ.
Robert B. Winn
Technical Details
Message-ID: <80806b1c-5918-4555-89e2-e47c3987a1b6@w34g2000prm.googlegroups.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!w34g2000prm.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
References: <48581d68$1@clear.net.nz> <9755c$485821e1$49e5d1d$4011@DIALUPUSA.NET> <4858b59f$1@clear.net.nz> <6bs4roF3dpis8U1@mid.individual.net> <062a4aa8-c7d8-4bef-a0ea-1962938701ba@f63g2000hsf.googlegroups.com> <884e5992-7364-40c6-9d03-4c22aafd215b@z72g2000hsb.googlegroups.com> <y8D8k.63141$7m7.42046@newsfe30.ams2> <74e6eff8-410e-4b2d-a0e6-02502e5a0cbe@v26g2000prm.googlegroups.com> <df084d52-af14-46d7-8007-73d87d68d111@k30g2000hse.googlegroups.com> <7a37fe43-f010-4321-9a28-9734acbe5652@2g2000hsn.googlegroups.com> <Pine.SOL.3.96.1080626134221.14285B-100000@libra.cus.cam.ac.uk> <1214510991.14617.0@proxy02.news.clara.net>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 10b271,d932fee6d9806ab9
X-Google-Thread: 102f53,dac8026861d35fee
X-Google-Thread: f442a,d932fee6d9806ab9
X-Google-Thread: 116469,d932fee6d9806ab9
X-Google-Attributes: gid10b271,gid102f53,gidf442a,gid116469,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,UTF8
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!w34g2000prm.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: rbwinn <rbwinn3@juno.com>
Newsgroups: sci.physics,cam.misc,alt.sci.physics,alt.atheism
Subject: Re: Does God need to prove He exists?
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 19:05:55 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 61
Message-ID: <80806b1c-5918-4555-89e2-e47c3987a1b6@w34g2000prm.googlegroups.com>
References: <48581d68$1@clear.net.nz> <9755c$485821e1$49e5d1d$4011@DIALUPUSA.NET> 
 <4858b59f$1@clear.net.nz> <6bs4roF3dpis8U1@mid.individual.net>
 <062a4aa8-c7d8-4bef-a0ea-1962938701ba@f63g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>
 <884e5992-7364-40c6-9d03-4c22aafd215b@z72g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>
 <y8D8k.63141$7m7.42046@newsfe30.ams2> <74e6eff8-410e-4b2d-a0e6-02502e5a0cbe@v26g2000prm.googlegroups.com>
 <df084d52-af14-46d7-8007-73d87d68d111@k30g2000hse.googlegroups.com>
 <7a37fe43-f010-4321-9a28-9734acbe5652@2g2000hsn.googlegroups.com>
 <Pine.SOL.3.96.1080626134221.14285B-100000@libra.cus.cam.ac.uk>
 <1214510991.14617.0@proxy02.news.clara.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 207.200.116.201
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1214532355 23982 127.0.0.1 (27 Jun 2008 02:05:55 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 02:05:55 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: w34g2000prm.googlegroups.com; posting-host=207.200.116.201; 
 posting-account=i6vpvwoAAABRbNds_JrzhNT-NaeHIrDG
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; AOL 9.0; Windows NT 5.1; 
 .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
X-HTTP-Via: HTTP/1.1 (Velocity/1.1.1 [uScMs f p eN:t cCMp s ]), HTTP/1.1 
 spider-ntc-td03.proxy.aol.com[CFC87063] (Prism/1.2.1), HTTP/1.1
 cache-ntc-ad07.proxy.aol.com[CFC874C9] (Traffic-Server/6.1.5 [uScM])