Article View: sci.physics
Article #14355Re: Does God need to prove He exists?
From: rbwinn
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 02:05
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 02:05
60 lines
4569 bytes
4569 bytes
On Jun 26, 1:09�pm, The Natural Philosopher <a...@b.c> wrote: > W.A. Sawford wrote: > > On Thu, 26 Jun 2008, rbwinn wrote: > > >> On Jun 26, 5:05� am, RobertL <robertml...@yahoo.com> wrote: > >>> On Jun 26, 4:48� am, rbwinn <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote: > > >>>> On Jun 25, 7:27�pm, "Smiler" <Smi...@Joe.King.com> wrote: > >> Well, if no one proved it, then it was not proven. � All you have done > >> is to say it was proven without showing any proof or anyone who is > >> suppsed to have done it. �Atheists have said they have proven all > >> manner of things. �Almost always it turns out to be something some > >> individual atheist put together that sounds good to other atheists. > >> Robert B. Winn > > > I wasn't going to get involved in all this (unless it's Friday, which it > > isn't) but I can't stand it any longer (sigh). > > > 'Atheists have said they have proven all manner of things.' > > > Well, what exactly have they claimed to have proved, and which atheists > > have claimed it? �Atheists don't actually need to 'prove' anything, > > because there is not a shred of evidence that god exists in the first > > place. The onus is not on atheists to prove the non-existence of god any > > more than the non-existence of the ravening bug-blatter beast of Traal. > > Completely wrong. The concept of God is not a scientific hypotheis, nor > a fact. > > So it can't be proven or disproven. > > Its simply a shorthand for 'all the wide and wonderful stuff we cant get > a handle on; and feel scared by' more or less. > > Atheism isn't so much denying His existence, nor yet keeping and open > mind on the subject (agnostic) its merely sidestepping the whole mess as > something one can simply do without. > > > Show me some real evidence and I'll think about belief. Although actual > > evidence would of course remove the need for belief in the first place... > > That's the whole point. Belief is a state of mind that has utility. Its > a little bit of Wise-ardry. Headology. > > Wise-ards understand that believing in something is an action, not a > statement about its existence, or lack thereof. > > > > > Wendy- Hide quoted text - > Well, what atheists do not like to discuss is Jesus Christ. Robert B. Winn
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<80806b1c-5918-4555-89e2-e47c3987a1b6@w34g2000prm.googlegroups.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!w34g2000prm.googlegroups.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<48581d68$1@clear.net.nz> <9755c$485821e1$49e5d1d$4011@DIALUPUSA.NET> <4858b59f$1@clear.net.nz> <6bs4roF3dpis8U1@mid.individual.net> <062a4aa8-c7d8-4bef-a0ea-1962938701ba@f63g2000hsf.googlegroups.com> <884e5992-7364-40c6-9d03-4c22aafd215b@z72g2000hsb.googlegroups.com> <y8D8k.63141$7m7.42046@newsfe30.ams2> <74e6eff8-410e-4b2d-a0e6-02502e5a0cbe@v26g2000prm.googlegroups.com> <df084d52-af14-46d7-8007-73d87d68d111@k30g2000hse.googlegroups.com> <7a37fe43-f010-4321-9a28-9734acbe5652@2g2000hsn.googlegroups.com> <Pine.SOL.3.96.1080626134221.14285B-100000@libra.cus.cam.ac.uk> <1214510991.14617.0@proxy02.news.clara.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 10b271,d932fee6d9806ab9 X-Google-Thread: 102f53,dac8026861d35fee X-Google-Thread: f442a,d932fee6d9806ab9 X-Google-Thread: 116469,d932fee6d9806ab9 X-Google-Attributes: gid10b271,gid102f53,gidf442a,gid116469,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,UTF8 Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!w34g2000prm.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: rbwinn <rbwinn3@juno.com> Newsgroups: sci.physics,cam.misc,alt.sci.physics,alt.atheism Subject: Re: Does God need to prove He exists? Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 19:05:55 -0700 (PDT) Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 61 Message-ID: <80806b1c-5918-4555-89e2-e47c3987a1b6@w34g2000prm.googlegroups.com> References: <48581d68$1@clear.net.nz> <9755c$485821e1$49e5d1d$4011@DIALUPUSA.NET> <4858b59f$1@clear.net.nz> <6bs4roF3dpis8U1@mid.individual.net> <062a4aa8-c7d8-4bef-a0ea-1962938701ba@f63g2000hsf.googlegroups.com> <884e5992-7364-40c6-9d03-4c22aafd215b@z72g2000hsb.googlegroups.com> <y8D8k.63141$7m7.42046@newsfe30.ams2> <74e6eff8-410e-4b2d-a0e6-02502e5a0cbe@v26g2000prm.googlegroups.com> <df084d52-af14-46d7-8007-73d87d68d111@k30g2000hse.googlegroups.com> <7a37fe43-f010-4321-9a28-9734acbe5652@2g2000hsn.googlegroups.com> <Pine.SOL.3.96.1080626134221.14285B-100000@libra.cus.cam.ac.uk> <1214510991.14617.0@proxy02.news.clara.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: 207.200.116.201 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1214532355 23982 127.0.0.1 (27 Jun 2008 02:05:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 02:05:55 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: w34g2000prm.googlegroups.com; posting-host=207.200.116.201; posting-account=i6vpvwoAAABRbNds_JrzhNT-NaeHIrDG User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; AOL 9.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) X-HTTP-Via: HTTP/1.1 (Velocity/1.1.1 [uScMs f p eN:t cCMp s ]), HTTP/1.1 spider-ntc-td03.proxy.aol.com[CFC87063] (Prism/1.2.1), HTTP/1.1 cache-ntc-ad07.proxy.aol.com[CFC874C9] (Traffic-Server/6.1.5 [uScM])