🚀 go-pugleaf

If all the "Ice Sheets Melt", no one within this anti-think-tank of
Usenet denial will actually care, the rich will simply get a whole lot
richer and Earth will become less populated.  That's an atheist faith-
based sort of holy grail win-win for their good old status quo naysay
gipper.

Since Venus, Sirius, our moon's L1, the moving of our moon to Earth's
L1, the regular laws of physics and of the best available science is
still so taboo/nondisclosure and/or topic off-limits, whereas I
thought I'd share a little something other that's warm and fuzzy from
the honest beer keg wisdom of "G=EMC^2 Glazier".

What if NASA and Eclipse / What if Milky Way Core Eclipse
On May 15, 3:49 pm, herbertglaz...@webtv.net (G=EMC^2 Glazier) wrote:
> That's the biggest eclipse,and we have to look along its plane than we
> are blocked by its massive very bright hub(core)   We can't see that
> there is a star on the other side that has a blue marble planet. They
> can't see us, nor will there be a time we can send radio waves across
> this Black hole hub. It is a mutual blind spot.  Mother nature does not
> want humankind to have company.    Beeert

That's a perfectly good enough way to look at it.  After all, if we
actually knew of another universe like ours, or even of an intelligent
life capable other planet, we'd most likely want to dominate it and/or
we'd simply pillage, plunder, rape and nuke it for all it's worth
(pretty much exactly like we're doing to Earth), and then some.

If a super black hole of creation produced our vast Universe, then as
such there has to be at least that one other universe that shot out
the other pole.  At least that's the required reaction of known
physics that has to coexist, or else we're down to the Atheist worthy
singular implosion that doesn't make any sense whatsoever.

In our own back yard, Mars is still a totally weird little planet that
simply doesn't have the salt that it takes, as for being a certified
member planet from the same origin as Earth (one of us doesn't fit the
mold), yet there's still no other contributed arguments pertaining to
that little matter of fact.  In fact, Venus along with it's rather
newish planetology worth of substantial geothermal energy loss, of
20.5 w/m2 being a good 256 fold greater than Earth, is anything but
from the same realm of planetary creation as Earth or Mars.

Our physically dark moon is still a whole lot saltier than can be
explained by way of anything NASA/Apollo, and yet that too is of a
taboo/nondisclosure topic rating, as are those naked anticathode
matters of gamma and hard-Xrays, along with the planet Venus and a few
other missing items that a given unfiltered Kodak FOV by rights and
within film dynamic range should have recorded.

We're so used to being screwed over by our own kind, but has Usenet's
bone gone soft on us?

I was just wondering about this lack of bone because, as for the fence
jumping atheistic sort of borg like collective they are, going with
the flow of the winning side regardless of whatever moral issues, and
as usual without a speck of remorse, seems to have been what their
usual Old Testament thumping past has always been associated with.
Their being naysay as to anything that's off-world intelligent is also
another rather odd trademark that's associated with their flavor of
'show me the money' atheism.

Much like our badly failing environment, evolution mutations of what I
perceive as the lost of nifty attributes, and/or of mostly negative
going DNA/RNA attributes, has currently been the accepted if not the
cultivated norm of atheism (no wonder the honestly faith based
alternatives are so much smarter and otherwise open to other
interpretations).  In the ideal terrestrial limited and thus skewed
science and conditional physics world of Usenet Atheism, whereas in
order to out-live one another, all it takes is loot and 100 fold more
energy to burn than others are getting access to.

Being educated as dumb and dumber so that you can be formally
snookered and most easily dumbfounded past the point of no return is
still a good part of their mainstream status quo, of having learned
from whatever's the best hype and conjecture worth of eye candy and
orchestrated infomercial science, and otherwise from whatever their
conditional physics has to offer is an accepted moral past, present
and future, of where the ends justify the means of collateral damage
and the carnage of the innocent.

In Usenet Naysay Land:
All of the sudden, it's becoming perfectly OK that we haven't actually
walked on the moon.  How odd.

All of the sudden, life on planets and even a few moons (including our
moon) that are clearly worse off than Venus is becoming humanly
doable, and somehow worthy of our spending those hard earned billions
upon billions (actually it has become trillions), as in no big
freaking deal.  How odd.

All of the sudden it's perfectly OK that there have been far better
than nuclear energy options, as long as we don't ever talk about
investing or much less utilizing such, or much less share a good word
on behalf of the secondary benefits of having this spare clean energy
as for creating Lh2 and h2o2.

Since the regular physics of our very own moon or of any such orbital
mascon related issue is taboo, thereby our best terrestrial science of
planetology still hasn't an honest physics clue as to why Earth has
been getting hotter, and that too is OK by usenet standards as long as
your two feet arnt getting too wet or too hot and you can afford
whatever's the cost of energy, along with the cost of storm recovery
or whatever's the spendy task of relocation.

Public supercomputers of the necessary complex 3D orbital, of
substantial tether loading and of complex lithobraking/impact
simulation capability are still being kept off-limits, as per
remaining taboo/nondisclosure rated.  Folks in charge, like so many
others claiming to know all there is to know, as such still can't
manage to lift an honest science or physics finger unless it's on
behalf of polishing something worthy of their atheism that's rather
oddly Old Testament and thus in one way or another Jewish worthy
(because that's where most all the serious loot currently is).

WWIII over global energy domination is just a touch of two buttons
away, is apparently no big deal in the bigoted eyes of these atheistic
fence jumpers that are going over to whichever's the winning side
anyway.

All of the sudden it's becoming an accepted matter of fact that 99.9%
of Usenet's status quo naysayism is actually white and/or Jewish to
boot.  I'd ask for an ethnic and/or faith-based showing of hands, but
that too would be against the best wishes of these status quo
rusemasters, that as incest cloned borgs prefer to remain as cloak and
dagger spooks and moles that have no intentions of ever constructively
contributing to any given topic that's not already scripted within
their koran.

Apparently, being an Atheist in denial is equal to being a born-again
liar, because they always get to pick and choose the winning side,
including as often as that side changes hand or of taking whichever
mindset that so happens to suit whatever ulterior motive or hidden
agenda that needs the most butt protecting or vote getting, making
their fence jumping religion of Atheism the all around best choice of
science and physics that hasn't a stitch of remorse to lose.
-
Brad Guth