Article View: sci.physics
Article #14546How much global warming(GW) is our local mascon good for?
From: BradGuth
Date: Wed, 02 May 2007 02:14
Date: Wed, 02 May 2007 02:14
57 lines
4369 bytes
4369 bytes
It's supposedly taking the equivalent of 2e20 joules, or roughly the equal of 7.2e21 KW worth of gravity force(Fg), as for representing the equivalent in centripetal force(Fc) of mutually holding onto our moon, or perhaps its actually a little of vise versa. How much of that energy budget is getting transferred into Earth? (< 7.2e21 KW ?) How about allowing 0.0001% of just 1/6th = 1.2e15 KW That's only 2.347 KW/m2, or rather a wussy 1.1075e-3 W/m3 [excluding our atmosphere], or perhaps as little a 1.1 mw/m3 including the volume of our wet atmosphere) seems rather insignificant, doesn't it. Gravity has certainly been one of those real measured forces, and the associated energy of that force is clearly going to/from somewhere other than into thin air (sort of speak). Much of earth's surface and especially of its interior is not a solid, and of such fluid stuff (including our polluted and wet atmosphere) is affected by and thus moved along by those unavoidable interactions of the moon's gravity, of which is causing all sorts of friction. Earth's moon is considerably more than a thousand fold of greater mass per ratio of it's planet than any other moon within our solar system, with the exception of those icy little binary planets or the likes of Oort cloud debris that simply arnt all that robust to start with, and much less the least bit internally fluid, whereas our moon is certainly close by and fast moving enough to having a significant tidal impact (inside and out) upon our environment. Then we have our moon's (IR)radiance = ? w/m2 Like a mirror that's better at reflecting IR photons (certainly way better than Earth's albedo that's supposedly contributing a total IR planetshine worth of 266 w/m2 [with hardly any of those FIR photons to spare}, whereas that naked and physically dark moon is unavoidably creating those secondary/recoil worthy FIR photons, is why there's a fairly substantial IR/FIR terrestrial influx that's measurably good for having contributed a little something of extra applied energy into our GW situation. (too bad we still haven't established a moon L1 science platform for actively telling us this essential information) In the past I've often asked the question; are we being global warmed to death by our moon? In more ways than not, I believe the regular laws of physics and of the best available science has been telling us the truth, that in fact we are being warmed to death by our moon that has only been with us since the last ice age this planet will ever see. Too bad we're not ever going to get ourselves smart enough for relocating that nasty moon of ours out to Earth's L1, for accomplishing such moderation of that pesky tidal force, and for otherwise obtaining shade to burn (sort of speak), and we could still have the LSE-CM/ISS along with its nifty tether dipole element hosting the best NEO diverting laser cannon, plus loads of nifty Star Wars stuff to boot. - Brad Guth
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1178072047.983654.313060@y5g2000hsa.googlegroups.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!y5g2000hsa.googlegroups.com!not-for-mailShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 10b271,8a07395a31c570d7,start X-Google-Thread: fdc67,8a07395a31c570d7,start X-Google-Thread: f74ae,8a07395a31c570d7,start X-Google-Thread: 1038c2,8a07395a31c570d7,start X-Google-Thread: 102f53,8a07395a31c570d7,start X-Google-Attributes: gid10b271,gidfdc67,gidf74ae,gid1038c2,gid102f53,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!y5g2000hsa.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: BradGuth <bradguth@gmail.com> Newsgroups: sci.physics,alt.astronomy,sci.astro,alt.sci.physics.new-theories,cam.misc Subject: How much global warming(GW) is our local mascon good for? Date: 1 May 2007 19:14:08 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 58 Message-ID: <1178072047.983654.313060@y5g2000hsa.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.91.99.44 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Trace: posting.google.com 1178072048 8352 127.0.0.1 (2 May 2007 02:14:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 02:14:08 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; MSN 2.5; Windows 98; T312461),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: y5g2000hsa.googlegroups.com; posting-host=64.91.99.44; posting-account=zEXP4w0AAAAJ5s7atsfc5JlL--hpDELy