🚀 go-pugleaf

"Pete" <Pete.Campbell@madmen.ca> wrote in message 
news:MPG.2736c50fd12127098a0b3@news.x-privat.org...
> Oy rool out a carbon tax wrote
>> This in no way absolves the IPCC of its gross ineptitude and its total
>> discreditation in claiming to be "scientific". If you were a real
>> scientist yourself you would know that this "error", as you call it, in
>> a major publication (IPCC Fourth Assessment Report) is an abomination in
>> the eyes of science. It's not that the number happened to be "wrong" -
>> it's the entire context in which it was allowed to be included (correct
>> or otherwise) in such a cavalier manner. Attempts to "correct" and
>> band-aid such a fundamental blunder can, in no way, cover up the fact
>> that this committee is nothing but a sham in the scientific context.
>>
>
> Please explain why the IPCC is guilty of anything.   When the IPCC isn't 
> even the
> source of climate change study, but a condiut?
>

No need for sources
One only has to look at their actions and how they are responsible for the 
follow-up mess
1)    They claimed that since they were "scientists" they had a handle on 
the "science"
2)    As a "conduit", they conducted false and misleading data to come to 
false and misleading conclusions
3)    In effect, they wrapped themselves in the mantle of "scientists" to 
foist UNscientific data on the public, so that they could push their agenda
        In other words they participated in a BIG CON job.



>
>
> You know, you're like those idiots who loved Bush and said that everything 
> fell
> apart when the Democrats held the house, but when challenged for the 
> reasons why,
> can't come up with a single example of why.
>

It's the house and not BUsh that has the final say on ANY spending
So it was the Dem controlled houses that ACTUALLY had FULL control of ANY 
signed bills to bail out businesses.


> So, please elucidate, or fuck off.
>

After you, you mindless idiot

> I'm sick of mindless whining.
>
>

So stop whining