🚀 go-pugleaf

On Apr 30, 9:23 am, "kdth...@yahoo.com" <kdth...@earthlink.net> wrote:
> On Apr 28, 2:08 am, Duncan Patton a Campbell <campb...@neotext.ca>
> wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 24 Apr 2010 09:19:43 -0700, kdth...@yahoo.com wrote:
> > > Such brilliant insight from such great scientists as Jones, Mann, and
> > > Briffa.
>
> > Who couldn't have spiked the entire climate change argument better if
> > they'd been paid and planned it that way... hmm...
>
> > Dhu
>
> > --
> > Duncan Patton a Campbell is Dhu >>> Ne Obliviscaris
>
> And now the remaining charlatans are trying to say that the works of
> these scientists are not fundamental to the IPCC or that the proxies
> are not fundamental to climatology, of which these scientists had
> complete domination.
>
> Without proxies, one does not have climatology at all, since
> temperature records go back only 130 years at best. Not enough time to
> develop any science at all in regards to climate.
>
> Using the proxies is the only means that this theoretical science
> exists at all.
>
> And these scientists are also the core of the IPCC. The temperature
> statistics from before 1950, and all of the theoretical 'corrections'
> to the corrupted raw data.
>
> If these scientists are not the basis for the IPCC, then the IPCC will
> have no problem with eradicating any of their work, references or
> postulations from theses charlatans.
> This would only mean they have nothing.
>
> At this point it is interesting to watch these fanatic idiots continue
> in their obsession with screwing with other peoples use of fuel, so
> accustomed they are to plying their lies and people believing in their
> liquid horseshit.
>
> KD