🚀 go-pugleaf

On Apr 28, 2:08 am, Duncan Patton a Campbell <campb...@neotext.ca>
wrote:
> On Sat, 24 Apr 2010 09:19:43 -0700, kdth...@yahoo.com wrote:
> > Such brilliant insight from such great scientists as Jones, Mann, and
> > Briffa.
>
> Who couldn't have spiked the entire climate change argument better if
> they'd been paid and planned it that way... hmm...
>
> Dhu
>
> --
> Duncan Patton a Campbell is Dhu >>> Ne Obliviscaris

And now the remaining charlatans are trying to say that the works of
these scientists are not fundamental to the IPCC or that the proxies
are not fundamental to climatology, of which these scientists had
complete domination.

Without proxies, one does not have climatology at all, since
temperature records go back only 130 years at best. Not enough time to
develop any science at all in regards to climate.

Using the proxies is the only means that this theoretical science
exists at all.

And these scientists are also the core of the IPCC. The temperature
statistics from before 1950, and all of the theoretical 'corrections'
to the corrupted raw data.

If these scientists are not the basis for the IPCC, then the IPCC will
have no problem with eradicating any of their work, references or
postulations from theses charlatans.
This would only mean they have nothing.

At this point it is interesting to watch these fanatic idiots continue
in their obsession with screwing with other peoples use of fuel, so
accustomed they are to plying their lies and people believing in their
liquid horseshit.

KD