Re: Is element 123 edible ? ? ?

Article View: sci.physics

Article #14660

#14660

From: Eric Gisse
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 00:15

13 lines
1449 bytes

netspider4@lycos.com (Karl-Hugo Weesberg) wrote in message news:<7666ed5f.0410222002.1603342a@posting.google.com>...
> I heard that the elements 110-118 don't taste that good, but elements
> 119-127 should be quite tasty, especially with mustard.
> 
> Is that true or bogus?

Partially true. What you are tasting are not those particular
elements. What you are tasting is the plentiful bounty of decay
products that come from those elements.

Plutonium has a lemony tang, it is very distinct when reached. Do spit
out the gumball before it accumulates too much lead. Lead is bad for
you.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <fd0fc2fa.0410251615.626416d2@posting.google.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail

References: <7666ed5f.0410222002.1603342a@posting.google.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Thread: 10b271,ea3fe8e9b4147d2f
X-Google-Thread: f4f6f,ea3fe8e9b4147d2f
X-Google-Attributes: gid10b271,gidf4f6f,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail
From: fsegg@uaf.edu (Eric Gisse)
Newsgroups: sci.physics,can.uucp
Subject: Re: Is element 123 edible ? ? ?
Date: 25 Oct 2004 17:15:19 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 13
Message-ID: <fd0fc2fa.0410251615.626416d2@posting.google.com>
References: <7666ed5f.0410222002.1603342a@posting.google.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 137.229.58.8
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1098749720 6393 127.0.0.1 (26 Oct 2004 00:15:20 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 00:15:20 +0000 (UTC)

Reply to Parent Message