Article View: sci.physics
Article #14733Re: NPR - no doubt its AGW
From: Transition Zone
Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2012 00:28
Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2012 00:28
28 lines
3339 bytes
3339 bytes
On Mar 1, 8:05 pm, Marvin the Martian <mar...@ontomars.org> wrote: > On Wed, 29 Feb 2012 21:24:15 -0600, Mickey Langan wrote: > > On 2012-03-01, Bill Snyder <bsny...@airmail.net> wrote: > >> On Wed, 29 Feb 2012 17:56:43 -0600, wil...@nospam.pobox.com (Will > >>>Earth temperature can be used as an input to atmospheric models, but > >>>NEVER an output, as Hansen's GISS model tries to do.. > > >> And, of course, the fact that those who've actually done the math > >> disagree, counts for nothing against the BS of a random Usenet troll. > > > "Done the math"? Like it is a simple closed system with variables that > > lend themseves to such a thing... > > >>> BTW, In all my measurements of atmospheric IR transmission, > >>>averages mean nothing! It is the "Aw Shits" that are significant! > > >> Now *that* I can believe; in any endeavor this one was involved in, the > >> "aw shit's" would definitely predominate. > > > If the climate were dominated by positive feedback loops, it would have > > spun out of control a long time ago. > > True. TheAGWfabricators are grasping at straws. They don't know the > first thing about feedback systems. Yawn. Climate researchers don't need to adhere to the dictates of goons like you.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<ef8bf4d0-6ccf-4c00-8472-6c073ac08bab@ge5g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!h9ni32425pbe.0!nntp.google.com!news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!ge5g2000vbb.googlegroups.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<M3a2r.17395$HR6.10715@newsfe21.iad> <slrnjksk7j.p63.mickey@bill.heins.net> <DmJ5SKFdRQph-pn2-bg0pVLhN4KOv@209-142-179-177.dyn.centurytel.net> <fgftk7ph6e0hrlorp5achisdb1c6r3j333@4ax.com> <slrnjktquv.v9e.mickey@bill.heins.net> <m4adnR5v-912gc3SnZ2dnUVZ5oKdnZ2d@giganews.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 10b271,83a338e3957b53eb
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Thread: f6f53,83a338e3957b53eb
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Thread: 1141a2,cd0bd2f92d994080,start
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Thread: 105dfd,cd0bd2f92d994080,start
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Thread: 112f4a,cd0bd2f92d994080,start
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gid54ac8f410d,gid6f3ffa9d42,gid341c349ce0,gid5c7cf1c04f,gid671f4ababb,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Received: by 10.68.221.4 with SMTP id qa4mr11178040pbc.7.1330734514526;
Fri, 02 Mar 2012 16:28:34 -0800 (PST)
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!h9ni32425pbe.0!nntp.google.com!news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!ge5g2000vbb.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Transition Zone <mogulah@hotmail.com>
Newsgroups: sci.physics,alt.global-warming,alt.politics,dc.politics,sci.geo.meteorology
Subject: Re: NPR - no doubt its AGW
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2012 16:28:33 -0800 (PST)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 28
Message-ID: <ef8bf4d0-6ccf-4c00-8472-6c073ac08bab@ge5g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>
References: <M3a2r.17395$HR6.10715@newsfe21.iad> <slrnjksk7j.p63.mickey@bill.heins.net>
<DmJ5SKFdRQph-pn2-bg0pVLhN4KOv@209-142-179-177.dyn.centurytel.net>
<fgftk7ph6e0hrlorp5achisdb1c6r3j333@4ax.com> <slrnjktquv.v9e.mickey@bill.heins.net>
<m4adnR5v-912gc3SnZ2dnUVZ5oKdnZ2d@giganews.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 65.88.88.252
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1330734514 6663 127.0.0.1 (3 Mar 2012 00:28:34 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2012 00:28:34 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: ge5g2000vbb.googlegroups.com; posting-host=65.88.88.252; posting-account=tQA_9wkAAAC8kqTdBlJnXYniA-oBKt-8
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1;
Trident/4.0; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152;
.NET CLR 3.5.30729),gzip(gfe)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable