Article View: sci.physics
Article #1481Re: ZERO Nuclear impact (was: Is car pooling for real? etc)
From: Greg Lindahl
Date: Sat, 25 Jul 1992 17:48
Date: Sat, 25 Jul 1992 17:48
11 lines
1234 bytes
1234 bytes
In article <1992Jul25.171557.4574@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> crb7q@kelvin.seas.Virginia.EDU (Cameron Randale Bass) writes: > Only two big problems. 1) It is not economical to do so, > 2) Hydrogen go boom. Gee, Dale, I've seen both of these arguments addressed in recent Scientific American articles. I'm glad that you're an expert on the topic of hydrogen fuel, just like you're an expert on electrical power generation, but could you be bothered to support your arguments instead of just spouting them? Also, could you pick a better newsgroup? Thank you.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Jul25.174836.4853@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!darwin.sura.net!mips!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!linac!att!rutgers!concert!uvaarpa!murdoch!fermi.clas.Virginia.EDU!gl8fReferences:
<1992Jul24.210910.5092@vexcel.com> <1992Jul24.221351.10050@Princeton.EDU> <1992Jul25.171557.4574@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!darwin.sura.net!mips!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!linac!att!rutgers!concert!uvaarpa!murdoch!fermi.clas.Virginia.EDU!gl8f From: gl8f@fermi.clas.Virginia.EDU (Greg Lindahl) Newsgroups: sci.physics Subject: Re: ZERO Nuclear impact (was: Is car pooling for real? etc) Message-ID: <1992Jul25.174836.4853@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> Date: 25 Jul 92 17:48:36 GMT References: <1992Jul24.210910.5092@vexcel.com> <1992Jul24.221351.10050@Princeton.EDU> <1992Jul25.171557.4574@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> Sender: usenet@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU Organization: Department of Astronomy, University of Virginia Lines: 11