Article View: sci.physics
Article #14810Re: THE 'RADIUS' OF THE ELECTRON?
From: Y.Porat
Date: Sun, 03 Aug 2008 03:36
Date: Sun, 03 Aug 2008 03:36
50 lines
3904 bytes
3904 bytes
On Aug 2, 5:54 pm, PD <TheDraperFam...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Aug 1, 11:00 pm, "Y.Porat" <y.y.po...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Aug 1, 10:32 pm, PD <TheDraperFam...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Aug 1, 10:02 am, "Y.Porat" <y.y.po...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Aug 1, 4:10 pm, PD <TheDraperFam...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > We don't know. I already told you that. > We have no evidence that it has any constituents. We don't have any > proof that it has no constituents. > But what I've just said is that you cannot decide that question on the > basis of whether it has mass. Mass does not imply volume. Therefore > you cannot use the fact that it has mass to conclude that it has > volume and therefore structure and therefore constituents. > It *may* have volume, and it *may* have constituents, but you don't > KNOW that just because it has mass. > > Now, what you can do is to take all the particles we don't have any > evidence one way or the other about structure: electrons, muons, taus, > neutrinos, quarks --- and *suppose* they have structure, and then ask > what implications would follow from that. For that to be a useful > exercise, the supposition should allow you to *calculate* some > properties of these particles -- their masses, for example, or their > decay rates into each other. Until you can do that kind of > calculation, the supposition is just that -- idle and useless > supposition. A physical theory does more than suppose. > > PD -------------------- 1 what is the difference according to you between a point particle and Vacum ?? 2 have you ever seen the abstract of my model ?? if not i can send it to you privately ... 3 there are some surprises even for you TIA Y.Porat ----------------------------------..
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<dda9eac0-7e04-4a15-ad96-2acdff6a1572@e39g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!e39g2000hsf.googlegroups.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<37bc1407-57d5-4632-abd5-b3fb37082dd2@w1g2000prk.googlegroups.com> <Pine.WNT.4.64.0808010653500.532@serene.st> <g6tbrb0211e@drn.newsguy.com> <f6d90bf7-5e73-451e-a319-614dab16873b@d45g2000hsc.googlegroups.com> <17a15b19-975a-42ce-87f1-3e1db9c00e86@56g2000hsm.googlegroups.com> <e3cd08ff-961c-4de4-9955-4c5d1199efac@u12g2000prd.googlegroups.com> <055b0061-7fc2-4fef-ab3b-9e1a0e0447e1@y38g2000hsy.googlegroups.com> <1ed1a441-0b9c-4559-8fef-b6153975ecac@t54g2000hsg.googlegroups.com> <f904998d-3a8c-4ab0-ad3e-4cfc32bb7d9a@m36g2000hse.googlegroups.com> <92146a39-0fed-4622-a517-3993d20c4d31@e53g2000hsa.googlegroups.com> <cfa75cab-961c-44e9-aae1-a685c034cfe4@a70g2000hsh.googlegroups.com> <5ed156ec-1aa4-4ff0-af89-a5883ac16be7@e53g2000hsa.googlegroups.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 10b271,b2c2349f443d6943 X-Google-Thread: 104f62,b2c2349f443d6943 X-Google-Thread: f6c41,b2c2349f443d6943 X-Google-Attributes: gid10b271,gid104f62,gidf6c41,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!e39g2000hsf.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> Newsgroups: sci.physics,dk.videnskab,sci.physics.particle Subject: Re: THE 'RADIUS' OF THE ELECTRON? Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2008 20:36:55 -0700 (PDT) Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 50 Message-ID: <dda9eac0-7e04-4a15-ad96-2acdff6a1572@e39g2000hsf.googlegroups.com> References: <37bc1407-57d5-4632-abd5-b3fb37082dd2@w1g2000prk.googlegroups.com> <Pine.WNT.4.64.0808010653500.532@serene.st> <g6tbrb0211e@drn.newsguy.com> <f6d90bf7-5e73-451e-a319-614dab16873b@d45g2000hsc.googlegroups.com> <17a15b19-975a-42ce-87f1-3e1db9c00e86@56g2000hsm.googlegroups.com> <e3cd08ff-961c-4de4-9955-4c5d1199efac@u12g2000prd.googlegroups.com> <055b0061-7fc2-4fef-ab3b-9e1a0e0447e1@y38g2000hsy.googlegroups.com> <1ed1a441-0b9c-4559-8fef-b6153975ecac@t54g2000hsg.googlegroups.com> <f904998d-3a8c-4ab0-ad3e-4cfc32bb7d9a@m36g2000hse.googlegroups.com> <92146a39-0fed-4622-a517-3993d20c4d31@e53g2000hsa.googlegroups.com> <cfa75cab-961c-44e9-aae1-a685c034cfe4@a70g2000hsh.googlegroups.com> <5ed156ec-1aa4-4ff0-af89-a5883ac16be7@e53g2000hsa.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 77.127.8.214 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1217734615 23323 127.0.0.1 (3 Aug 2008 03:36:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 3 Aug 2008 03:36:55 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: e39g2000hsf.googlegroups.com; posting-host=77.127.8.214; posting-account=5GUrzQkAAADun29oaK3p_W_saUVxxHUF User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.0.1) Gecko/2008070208 Firefox/3.0.1,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)