🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: sci.physics
Article #14816

Re: THE 'RADIUS' OF THE ELECTRON?

#14816
From: PD
Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 13:10
37 lines
3129 bytes
On Aug 1, 6:00 am, Loui...@edu.herlufsholm.dk wrote:
> On 1 Aug., 06:14, Mitch Raemsch <mitch.nicolas.raem...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Electron is fundamental point particle.
>
> Real electrons are NOT ‘point-particles’ if the word ‘point’ has the
> same meaning as in the pure mathematics.
> It is only in the, maybe wrong, mathematical model of ‘fundamental’
> particles that it is assumed that electrons are ‘point-particles’.
>
> If electrons are real matter-/energy ‘particles’ then they MUST have
> some, maybe oscillating, mean geometrical extension!

That's simply incorrect. You are making a fundamental assumption that
everything that has mass also has volume. You are simply making an
extrapolation to an absolute status of a statement that is only known
to be true of *composite* materials, as I explained in an earlier post
in this thread. And for composite materials, the property of volume is
*not* associated with mass; it is associated with the *interactions*
between the constituents.

If you have this automatic association between mass and volume in your
head, then you must clear it out as an unjustified assumption. You are
overgeneralizing, and for the wrong reasons.


>
> - Electrons are without doubt composed of more fundamental
> ‘particles’.
>
> - It is time to explore the real ‘true’ nature of the electrons!
>
> Best regards
> Louis Nielsen
> Denmark
Technical Details
Message-ID: <1ed1a441-0b9c-4559-8fef-b6153975ecac@t54g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!t54g2000hsg.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
References: <37bc1407-57d5-4632-abd5-b3fb37082dd2@w1g2000prk.googlegroups.com> <Pine.WNT.4.64.0808010653500.532@serene.st> <g6tbrb0211e@drn.newsguy.com> <f6d90bf7-5e73-451e-a319-614dab16873b@d45g2000hsc.googlegroups.com> <17a15b19-975a-42ce-87f1-3e1db9c00e86@56g2000hsm.googlegroups.com> <e3cd08ff-961c-4de4-9955-4c5d1199efac@u12g2000prd.googlegroups.com> <055b0061-7fc2-4fef-ab3b-9e1a0e0447e1@y38g2000hsy.googlegroups.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 10b271,b2c2349f443d6943
X-Google-Thread: 104f62,b2c2349f443d6943
X-Google-Attributes: gid10b271,gid104f62,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,CP1252
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!t54g2000hsg.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: PD <TheDraperFamily@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: sci.physics,dk.videnskab
Subject: Re: THE 'RADIUS' OF THE ELECTRON?
Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 06:10:25 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 38
Message-ID: <1ed1a441-0b9c-4559-8fef-b6153975ecac@t54g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>
References: <37bc1407-57d5-4632-abd5-b3fb37082dd2@w1g2000prk.googlegroups.com> 
 <Pine.WNT.4.64.0808010653500.532@serene.st> <g6tbrb0211e@drn.newsguy.com>
 <f6d90bf7-5e73-451e-a319-614dab16873b@d45g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>
 <17a15b19-975a-42ce-87f1-3e1db9c00e86@56g2000hsm.googlegroups.com>
 <e3cd08ff-961c-4de4-9955-4c5d1199efac@u12g2000prd.googlegroups.com>
 <055b0061-7fc2-4fef-ab3b-9e1a0e0447e1@y38g2000hsy.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 12.43.229.154
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1217596225 13659 127.0.0.1 (1 Aug 2008 13:10:25 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 13:10:25 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: t54g2000hsg.googlegroups.com; posting-host=12.43.229.154; 
 posting-account=nPH_PQkAAACneDKT6RXopPWArC2We4Rq
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US) 
 AppleWebKit/525.13 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/3.1 Safari/525.13,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)