Article View: sci.physics
Article #14840Re: ARE ELECTRONS PHYSICAL ENTITIES?
From: tnlockyer
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 20:41
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 20:41
48 lines
3372 bytes
3372 bytes
On Jul 25, 1:35 pm, "tnlock...@aol.com" <tnlock...@aol.com> wrote: > On Jul 25, 2:10 am, Loui...@edu.herlufsholm.dk wrote: > > > ARE ELECTRONS PHYSICAL ENTITIES? > > If an electron is a physical matter-/energy ‘particle’ then it MUST > > have a maybe not definite mean geometrical extension. > > Louis, yes, the electron is geometrical, there is no way an electron > can have a magnetic moment without a current loop area. > > Note the magnetic moment has the dimensions of current times area. > > The electron has the largest magnetic moment of any subatomic > particle. > > NIST lists; Ue = 9.28476377 E-24 m^2 A for the electron. > > > THE STANDARD-MODEL IS NOT ULTIMATE, MAYBE WRONG? > > The standard model is a monumental failure, it cannot derive a single > fundamental physical constant, a fatal flaw. > > > It is in the not ultimate standard-model of ‘elementary-particles’ > > that an electron is described without a physical geometrical > > extension. > > In the standard-model of ‘elementary-particles’ the electron is > > described as a ‘point-particle’ that have been given AD HOC physical > > properties as mass, electric charge, spin, magnetic moment etc. > > Exactly correct, the standard model is the ultimate AD HOC theory. > > Worse, it does not work! > > > It must be time experimentally to discover the ‘true’ nature of the > > electron! > > The electron is a well measured particle. > > Here are the electron and positron geometric calculations. > > http://www.members.com/tnlockyer/CHARGESPIN.pdf > > Regards; Tom. Opps! Try. http://www.members.aol.com/tnlockyer/CHARGESPIN.pdf
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<179c5640-6ea0-4cf8-9a66-dfe713af4c05@v26g2000prm.googlegroups.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!v26g2000prm.googlegroups.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<bc9db64a-998d-4941-8ea0-1c40949c1048@z16g2000prn.googlegroups.com> <9b0058a2-c4c2-4735-bf28-b761aaf00d32@i24g2000prf.googlegroups.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 10b271,b9272b5062dfff78 X-Google-Thread: 104f62,b9272b5062dfff78 X-Google-Attributes: gid10b271,gid104f62,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,CP1252 Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!v26g2000prm.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: "tnlockyer@aol.com" <tnlockyer@aol.com> Newsgroups: sci.physics,dk.videnskab Subject: Re: ARE ELECTRONS PHYSICAL ENTITIES? Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 13:41:12 -0700 (PDT) Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 48 Message-ID: <179c5640-6ea0-4cf8-9a66-dfe713af4c05@v26g2000prm.googlegroups.com> References: <bc9db64a-998d-4941-8ea0-1c40949c1048@z16g2000prn.googlegroups.com> <9b0058a2-c4c2-4735-bf28-b761aaf00d32@i24g2000prf.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 207.200.116.201 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1217018472 2656 127.0.0.1 (25 Jul 2008 20:41:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 20:41:12 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: v26g2000prm.googlegroups.com; posting-host=207.200.116.201; posting-account=1J9nkwoAAACHRuOsHyA6gZVrV-47r1XA User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; AOL 9.1; AOLBuild 4334.34; Windows NT 6.0; SV1; SLCC1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; Media Center PC 5.0; .NET CLR 3.0.04506; .NET CLR 1.1.4322),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) X-HTTP-Via: HTTP/1.1 (Velocity/3.1.1.5 [uScMs f p eN:t cCMp s ]), HTTP/1.1 spider-ntc-tc03.proxy.aol.com[CFC87043] (Prism/1.2.1), HTTP/1.1 cache-ntc-ad07.proxy.aol.com[CFC874C9] (Traffic-Server/6.1.5 [uScM])