🚀 go-pugleaf

In article 
<f76ca9de-6543-4fa1-8d6b-b5122db704f5@x41g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>,
 Louis_N@edu.herlufsholm.dk wrote:

> COSMIC DECREASE OF GRAVITY and INCREASE OF THE DAY
> .
> By Louis Nielsen, Denmark
> Treatise: http://www.rostra.dk/louis
> 
> INCREASE OF THE DAY
> With a cosmic decrease of Newton�s gravitational �constant�, the Earth
> will expand. The result is that the mass is being distributed farther
> and farther from the axis of rotation. This causes the angular
> velocity of the Earth to decrease. A lower angular velocity is equal
> to a longer day. Technically speaking, the moment of inertia of the
> Earth increases gradually as the radius increases that caused by a
> decreasing gravity.
> In my treatise I derive an equation which gives a connection between
> one Earth-day t(1) when the Universe had an age T(1) and one Earth-day
> t(2) when the Universe had an age T(2). The equation which gives only
> the effect caused by a cosmic decreasing gravity is:
> 
> (1)   t(1) = t(2)*(T(1)/T(2))^(2/3)
> 
> From equation (1) we can calculate the Earth-day t(1) in the Devon
> period, about 400 million years ago.
> 
> Using the values T(2) = 13.5 billion years and T(1) = 13.1 billion
> years, and t(2) = 24 hour, we get:
> 
> (2)   t(1) = 24hour*(13.1/13.5)^(2/3) = 23.5 hour
> 
> The day of the Earth had been at least about 0.5 hour shorter 400
> million years ago.
> What says geological observations?

Why did you wait until the end of your mathematical ramblings to ask for 
the data? 

The light from faraway galaxies comes from the past,when you claim the 
gravitational constant was less. How come those galaxies appear to work 
according to the *same* laws of gravity, with the *same* gravitational 
constant as ours?

-- 
Timberwoof <me at timberwoof dot com> http://www.timberwoof.com
"When you post sewage, don't blame others for 
emptying chamber pots in your direction." �Chris L.