🚀 go-pugleaf

On Jan 19, 5:24 pm, Loui...@edu.herlufsholm.dk wrote:
> THE PLANCK-UNITS and THE QUANTUM-COSMOLOGICAL-UNITS.
>
> By Louis Nielsen
> Denmark
>
> Treatise:    http://www.rostra.dk/louis
>
> THE PLANCK QUANTITIES.
> The so-called Planck quantities are not based on a physical theory,
> and they are not basis for a physical theory. They are 'constructed'
> purely by dimensional analysis from Newton's gravitational constant G,
> the velocity of light c and Planck's constant h.
>
> The intention of Max Planck (1858-1947) was - in 1899 - to find a unit
> of length l(pl), a unit of time t(pl) and a unit of mass m(pl),
> independent of specific local systems.
> ( Reference: Max Planck: 'Über irreversible Strahlungsvorgänge'.
> Sitzungsberichte der Preußischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, vol. 5,
> p. 479 (1899) )
>
> The planck-length l(pl), the planck-time t(pl) and the planck-mass
> m(pl) are (without the number pi) defined by:
>
> (1)               l(pl) = ((h*G)/c^(3))^(1/2) = 4.1*10^(-35) meter
>
> (2)        t(pl) = l(pl)/c = 1.4*10^(-43) sec
>
> (3)        m(pl) = ((h*c)/G)^(1/2) = 5.5*10^(-8) kg
>
> Most cosmologists, trying to describe the earliest phases of the
> Universe by the Big Bang model, use the Planck time unit, about
> 10^(-43) sec, as the nearest possible time which can be used to
> approach the 'moment' of the Big Bang.
> Events before the Planck time cannot be described by the conventional
> cosmological theories. Einstein's general theory of relativity, which
> is basic for the accepted cosmological models, collapses when we try
> to analyse the early Universe. The reason is that the theory of
> general relativity is not based on quantum physics.
>
> THE QUANTUM-COSMOLOGICAL UNITS.
> Let us define the following absolute quantum-cosmological quantities:
> The elementary length, the 'quantum of length' r, the elementary time,
> the 'quantum of time' t, and the actual elementary mass, the 'quantum
> of mass' m.
> The absolute quantum-cosmological units are defined by:
>
> (4)     r = h/(M*c) = 1.4*10^(-102) meter
>
> (5)     t = r/c = 4.7*10^(-111) sec
>
> (6)     m = h/(R*c) = 2.2*10^(-68) kg
>
> In equation (4) M = 1.6*10^(60) kg is the total and constant mass of
> the Universe (See my treatise about a calculation of the value of M),
> h is Planck's constant and c is the velocity of light. In equation (6)
> R = 1*10^(26) meter is the actual extension of the Universe. The
> magnitude of the mass-quantum m in equation (6) is the value in our
> epoch.
>
> All lengths, time-intervals and masses are quantized.
>
> THE QUANTUM-EVOLUTION OF THE UNIVERSE.
> I postulate that the connection between the actual extension R of the
> Universe and the 'quantum of length' r is:
>
> (7)     R = n* r
>
> We can call n the 'Cosmic Evolution Quantum Number'. As the Universe
> evolves in 'quantum jumps' n is 'ticking' up through the natural
> numbers, beginning with the number one when the Universe came into
> existence.
> A discovery is that n is equal to the third power of the actual and
> variable ratio between the magnitudes of the electrostatic and the
> gravitostatic forces between two electrons. (Please see my treatise)
>
> The connection between the total mass M of the Universe and the actual
> 'quantum of mass' m is:
>
> (8)       M = n*m
>
> In (8) m is the mass of the actual - and variable - smallest energy-/
> matter quantum in the Universe. This energy-/matter quantum I have
> given the name Uniton (The cosmic unit particle).
> In our epoch n = 7.2*10^127. The actual value of n is equal to the
> actual number of possible Unitons in the Universe.
> In our epoch the number of possible Unitons in the Universe is thus
> equal to 7.2*10^127.
>
> The connection between the actual age T of the Universe and the
> 'quantum of time' t is:
>
> (9)     T = R/c  = n* t
>
> RELATIONS BETWEEN THE COSMIC QUANTUM-UNITS AND THE PLANCK'S UNITS.
> The quantum-cosmological quantities define a set of cosmic quantum-
> units, which are much smaller and much more fundamental than the
> Planck units. In my dissertation I show the connection between the
> cosmic quantum-units and the Planck units, and furthermore I show
> which role the Planck units play in the quantum-evolution of the
> Universe.
> From the equations (1) and (7) we can calculate the value n(pl) of the
> cosmic evolution quantum number when the Universe had an extension
> equal to the Planck length l(pl) and an age equal to the Planck time
> t(pl). We get:
>
> (10)    n(pl) = l(pl)/r = 2.9*10^(67)
>
> n(pl) - which is a natural number - is also the number of unitons in
> the Universe, when its age was equal to the Planck time.
> From equation (8) we can calculate the mass m(t(pl)) of a single
> Uniton when the Universe had an age equal to the Planck-time t(pl). We
> get:
>
> (11)    m(t(pl)) = M/n(pl) = 5.5*10^(-8) kg
>
> The result in equation (11) is interesting. Comparing the value in
> equation (11) with the value in equation (3) we see the following:
> The Planck mass m(pl) is equal to the mass m(t(pl)) of the Uniton,
> when the Universe had an extension equal to the Planck length and an
> age equal to the Planck time!
> The relatively great Planck mass has been an enigma. But the above
> considerations can explain the great value of the Planck mass.
>
> THE PLANCK QUANTUM-STATE OF THE UNIVERSE.
> When the Universe had an extension equal to the Planck length
> 4.1*10^(-35) meter, then it had an age equal to the Planck time
> 1.4*10^(-43) sec, and it consisted of 2.9*10^(67) Unitons, each with a
> mass equal to the Planck mass 5.5*10^(-8) kg.
>
> The Planck quantities can thus be derived from the following quantum-
> cosmological quantities:
> The quantum of length r, the quantum of time t and the total mass M of
> the Universe.
>
> You can study more in my treatise:
>
>        http://www.rostra.dk/louis
>
> Best regards
> Louis Nielsen
> Denmark


size is relative