Re: The Accelerating Universe and Decreasing Cosmic Gravity

Article View: sci.physics

Article #14900

#14900

From: dlzc
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 16:09

24 lines
2404 bytes

Dear John C. Polasek:

On Aug 14, 6:00 pm, John C. Polasek <jpola...@cfl.rr.com> wrote:
...
> I think the solution is a lot easier than jiggling with G.
> Isn't redshift the only way to measure such distances?
> They find that the observed intensity is less than
> expected from red-shift distance.

No, redshift is not the only way.  If there are type Ia supernovae
located in the "structure", there is the duration of the decay from
peak to some percentage of peak.  There is intensity of the source (1/
r^2, regardless of source... *assuming* something about the source).
All these methods agree to within the margin of error in the paper I
saw.

You even have the cooling of CMBR light as it affects interstellar
medium, which also agrees with "Universal expansion".

G (in my opinion) is more-or-less directly tied to c.  It may not be
fundamental, but it will always be the same value locally.  (Quantum
effects nothwithstanding.)

David A. Smith

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1187194192.954440.3760@j4g2000prf.googlegroups.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!j4g2000prf.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail

References: <1185835609.115111.188660@d55g2000hsg.googlegroups.com> <tsi4c3ts7q1akbk40hft5rs46uhjpqfcvg@4ax.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Thread: 10b271,58508f1f61521719
X-Google-Thread: f74ae,58508f1f61521719
X-Google-Thread: 104f62,58508f1f61521719
X-Google-Attributes: gid10b271,gidf74ae,gid104f62,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!j4g2000prf.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From:  dlzc <dlzc1@cox.net>
Newsgroups: sci.physics,sci.astro,dk.videnskab
Subject: Re: The Accelerating Universe and Decreasing Cosmic Gravity
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 09:09:52 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 25
Message-ID: <1187194192.954440.3760@j4g2000prf.googlegroups.com>
References: <1185835609.115111.188660@d55g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>
   <tsi4c3ts7q1akbk40hft5rs46uhjpqfcvg@4ax.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 144.223.172.78
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1187194193 23074 127.0.0.1 (15 Aug 2007 16:09:53 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 16:09:53 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: <tsi4c3ts7q1akbk40hft5rs46uhjpqfcvg@4ax.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.04506.30),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: j4g2000prf.googlegroups.com; posting-host=144.223.172.78;
   posting-account=ps2QrAMAAAA6_jCuRt2JEIpn5Otqf_w0

Reply to Parent Message