Article View: sci.physics
Article #14916The modified Hubble-relation. Negative Expansion-acceleration of the Universe?
From: Louis_N
Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2007 11:49
Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2007 11:49
72 lines
3773 bytes
3773 bytes
The modified Hubble-relation. Negative Expansion-acceleration of the Universe? By Louis Nielsen http://www.rostra.dk/louis In the following considerations about a modified Hubble-relation where the Hubble-function H(T) is determined by a decreasing gravitational 'constant' according to the relation: (1) H(T) = - (dG/dT)*(1/G) = (1/3)*(1/T) In equation (1) (dG/dT) is the time derivative of the variable decreasing gravitational 'constant' G and T is the actual age of the Universe. The mathematical connection between H(T) and T gives a hyperbola curve. The modified Hubble-relation is given by: (2) v(T) = H(T)*D(T) In equation (2) v(T) is the radial velocity of for example a galaxy at the time T and D(T) is the distance to the galaxy at the time T. By differentiation of the velocity in equation (2) we get the acceleration a(T) of the galaxy at the time T when it is in a distance D(T). We get: (3) a(T) = (- 2/9)* (D(T)/T^2) >From equation (3) we see that the acceleration a is negative! The velocity of the galaxy is decreasing. We can rewrite equation (3) so we have a relationship between a(T), v(T) and T. We get: (4) a(T) = (-2/3)* (v(T)/T) >From equation (4) we see: The negative acceleration of a given galaxy is inversely proportional to the actual age T of the Universe and directly proportional to the velocity v(T) Examples: If T = 15*10^9 years = 4.7*10^17 sec and v(T) = 3*10^5 m/s then we get an enormous small negative value for the acceleration given by: (5) a(T) = - 4.3*10^(-13) m/s^2 If T = 1*10^9 years = 3.15*10^16 sec and v(T) = 1*10^7 m/s we get: (6) a(T) = - 2.1*10^(-10) m/s^2 Conclusion of the above considerations: We see that the cosmic accelerations of the galaxies are negative and that the values are enormous small. If the above considerations are right then the Universe is acceleration in its expansion but with a negative acceleration which over time will brake up the expansion. My question to all of you: Is it ultimately found that the Universe is in an accelerated expansion and is it ultimately found that the acceleration is positive or can it be that the acceleration is negative? And what are the measured (calculated) values of the expansion-acceleration? PS: Is the observed acceleration-anomaly of the Pioneer Probes explained by the above considerations? Best regards Louis Nielsen Denmark http://www.rostra.dk/louis
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1185968975.751450.270780@w3g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!w3g2000hsg.googlegroups.com!not-for-mailShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 10b271,c7be40b32dc87384,start X-Google-Thread: f74ae,c7be40b32dc87384,start X-Google-Thread: 104f62,c7be40b32dc87384,start X-Google-Attributes: gid10b271,gidf74ae,gid104f62,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!w3g2000hsg.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: Louis_N@edu.herlufsholm.dk Newsgroups: sci.physics,sci.astro,dk.videnskab Subject: The modified Hubble-relation. Negative Expansion-acceleration of the Universe? Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2007 04:49:35 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 73 Message-ID: <1185968975.751450.270780@w3g2000hsg.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 87.58.137.197 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Trace: posting.google.com 1185968975 25690 127.0.0.1 (1 Aug 2007 11:49:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 11:49:35 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; MathPlayer 2.0; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; InfoPath.1),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: w3g2000hsg.googlegroups.com; posting-host=87.58.137.197; posting-account=ps2QrAMAAAA6_jCuRt2JEIpn5Otqf_w0