🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <1992Jul25.204400.6466@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> gl8f@fermi.clas.Virginia.EDU (Greg Lindahl) writes:
>In article <1992Jul25.195246.6135@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> crb7q@kelvin.seas.Virginia.EDU (Cameron Randale Bass) writes:
>
>>>Please rebut all the Scientific American articles that people have
>>>been refering to.
>>
>>     Sure, if you'll rebut every argument made in AEC-NRC documents over
>>     the last 40 years.
>
>Dale, I haven't been taking part in that argument at all. My only
>participation has been to point out that you've been making many
>claims, without any facts, that contradict the literature, namely the
>9-90 Scientific American issue and an additional Scientific American
>article on the merits and drawbacks of general use of hydrogen as
>fuel. I have made no claims or arguments other than that. I don't see
>why I should feel obligated to rebut documents that have nothing to do
>with what I've been talking about.

     You have not been pointing out any such thing.  You have been
     alluding to refutation without specifically noting any refutable
     points.  And as such, you have been saying nothing germane to the
     issue.

     In fact you have specifically avoided any discussion that might
     bear on the issue.

>If you like, I could give you a copy of the Scientific American issue
>in question. But I'm not holding my breath.

     I have been a subscriber since 1976.  Some issues are better than
     others.  Why don't you take a look at all the AEC and NUREG 
     documents I pointed out in the stuff you deleted.  A number
     have a direct bearing on what we've discussed here.  Of course,
     you'll actually have to do some work to find the relevant
     documents, but I'm sure you care enough to do so.

>>     However, feel free to present in this forum what you think valid 
>>     arguments against what I have said, or for some position you think
>>     plausible, and I will be sure to consider a response.
>
>Valid arguments against many things you have said may be found in the
>literature, mainly the 9-90 issue of Scientific American. Please read
>it. This is my last post on the topic, we're now going in circles
>(repeatedly).

     Good.  I prefer to discuss this with those who actually have
     something to say.

                                dale bass

                               

--
C. R. Bass                                           crb7q@virginia.edu
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering
University of Virginia
Charlottesville, Virginia                            (804) 924-7926