Article View: sci.physics
Article #15042Re: Gradient of potential function of dynamic field
From: Sergey Karavashkin
Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2004 22:38
Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2004 22:38
46 lines
3898 bytes
3898 bytes
dubious@radioactivex.lebesque-al.net (Bilge) wrote in message news:<slrnc60ln7.7pq.dubious@radioactivex.lebesque-al.net>... > Sergey Karavashkin: > >dubious@radioactivex.lebesque-al.net (Bilge) wrote in message news:<slrnc5odcb.5t.dubious@radioactivex.lebesque-al.net>... > >> Sergey Karavashkin: > >> > > >> >No smokescreen. I have presented just the proof. > >> > >> Then write down the scalar function \Phi for which you assert > >> the relation, \nabla x (\nabla\Phi) = 0 does not hold. Don't > >> give me a bunch of interpretational mumbo-jumbo, just write > >> the scalar function. > >> > >> >Determine the circulation of vector in my diagram and after this state > >> >curl(grad(phi)) = 0 identically. > >> > >> Write down the function \phi. I'm not going to sort through whatever > >> contortions you've gone through to get the wrong answer the hard way. > >> Just give me the function. > >> > >> >Still I see the smokescreen from your > >> >side, but the wing is from mine - this is why you are suffocating with > >> >your own smokescreen. Until you understand it, this will irritate your > >> >eyes. Your, not mine. ;-) > >> > >> Write down the scalar function. Don't add any of your personal > >> interpretations or try to ``explain'' how I have to calculate > >> something to get your answer. Just give me a scalar function. > >> I can take a gradient and curl. > > > >First, this what interests you will be in our next paper which we will > >publish soon. Second, with such interest to Andrew and his attempts to > >join non-joinable, this question is seemingly to him. Third, it is > >strange for me to respond to a person who in the neighbouring post > >addmits all what I'm saying, but in the posts to me denies everything > >what I'm saying. > > Just post the scalar function for which you think the curl of > its gradient in not zero. You don't need an article just to write > down a function. For you who even full proof don't accept as a grounds, just the function will tell nothing. I understand your hurry, but please have a patience and wait few days. ;-) Sergey
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<a42650fc.0403271438.7849c392@posting.google.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!postnews2.google.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<a42650fc.0402011435.6e84feaa@posting.google.com> <a42650fc.0403051416.435747e1@posting.google.com> <slrnc4itjl.64.dubious@radioactivex.lebesque-al.net> <a42650fc.0403121443.467ac642@posting.google.com> <slrnc54m9t.985.dubious@radioactivex.lebesque-al.net> <a42650fc.0403181447.619936b7@posting.google.com> <slrnc5odcb.5t.dubious@radioactivex.lebesque-al.net> <a42650fc.0403222157.33b67dc9@posting.google.com> <slrnc60ln7.7pq.dubious@radioactivex.lebesque-al.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1038c2,72b73c5fd98f8a36 X-Google-Attributes: gid1038c2,public X-Google-Thread: 10b271,72b73c5fd98f8a36 X-Google-Attributes: gid10b271,public X-Google-Thread: 10f545,72b73c5fd98f8a36 X-Google-Attributes: gid10f545,public X-Google-Thread: 106ae0,72b73c5fd98f8a36 X-Google-Attributes: gid106ae0,public X-Google-Thread: 1110fe,72b73c5fd98f8a36 X-Google-Attributes: gid1110fe,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2004-03-27 14:38:52 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!postnews2.google.com!not-for-mail From: selftrans@yandex.ru (Sergey Karavashkin) Newsgroups: sci.physics,sci.physics.electromag,alt.sci.physics.new-theories,fj.sci.matter,sci.physics.relativity Subject: Re: Gradient of potential function of dynamic field Date: 27 Mar 2004 14:38:51 -0800 Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 46 Message-ID: <a42650fc.0403271438.7849c392@posting.google.com> References: <a42650fc.0402011435.6e84feaa@posting.google.com> <a42650fc.0403051416.435747e1@posting.google.com> <slrnc4itjl.64.dubious@radioactivex.lebesque-al.net> <a42650fc.0403121443.467ac642@posting.google.com> <slrnc54m9t.985.dubious@radioactivex.lebesque-al.net> <a42650fc.0403181447.619936b7@posting.google.com> <slrnc5odcb.5t.dubious@radioactivex.lebesque-al.net> <a42650fc.0403222157.33b67dc9@posting.google.com> <slrnc60ln7.7pq.dubious@radioactivex.lebesque-al.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: 195.177.112.246 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1080427132 26456 127.0.0.1 (27 Mar 2004 22:38:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2004 22:38:52 +0000 (UTC)