Article View: sci.physics
Article #15045Re: Gradient of potential function of dynamic field
From: Sergey Karavashkin
Date: Sun, 04 Apr 2004 20:48
Date: Sun, 04 Apr 2004 20:48
34 lines
3370 bytes
3370 bytes
dubious@radioactivex.lebesque-al.net (Bilge) wrote in message news:<slrnc6fdpf.1d4.dubious@radioactivex.lebesque-al.net>... > Sergey Karavashkin: > > >For you who even full proof don't accept as a grounds, just the > >function will tell nothing. > > Sure it will. If you claim that there is a function \Phi for which the > curl of its gradient is no zero, then all you have to do to prove that is > post the function so I can take the curl of its gradient and see for > myself. Nothing could be simpler. I predict that you won't post your > so-called function, but will instead revert to some convoluted argument > which spends pages avoiding anything specific. > > >I understand your hurry, but please have a patience and wait few days. ;-) > > What happened? Did you discover you didn't have such a function and > you got a non-zero answer due to an arithmetic error and are going > try and find a new one? If not, then just post the function for which > you claim \nabla x (\nabla\Phi) is non-zero. If you are correct, the > function will make that self-evident, without any need for you to > create a convoluted, several page argument that handwaves your way > to a non-zero result for a result which is zero by any straight-forward > mathematical argument. > > Just post the function. If it exists and you know what it is, then > nothing prevents you from posting it, especially given the fact that > you would be quite happy to rub my nose in being wrong for telling > you that \nabla x (\nabla\Phi) = 0 is a mathematical identity. ;-) http://angelfire.lycos.com/la3/selftrans/v4_1/contents4.html#dipole Sergey
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<a42650fc.0404041248.39c33f9@posting.google.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<a42650fc.0402011435.6e84feaa@posting.google.com> <a42650fc.0403121443.467ac642@posting.google.com> <slrnc54m9t.985.dubious@radioactivex.lebesque-al.net> <a42650fc.0403181447.619936b7@posting.google.com> <slrnc5odcb.5t.dubious@radioactivex.lebesque-al.net> <a42650fc.0403222157.33b67dc9@posting.google.com> <slrnc60ln7.7pq.dubious@radioactivex.lebesque-al.net> <a42650fc.0403271438.7849c392@posting.google.com> <slrnc6fdpf.1d4.dubious@radioactivex.lebesque-al.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10b271,72b73c5fd98f8a36 X-Google-Attributes: gid10b271,public X-Google-Thread: 1110fe,72b73c5fd98f8a36 X-Google-Attributes: gid1110fe,public X-Google-Thread: 10f545,72b73c5fd98f8a36 X-Google-Attributes: gid10f545,public X-Google-Thread: 1038c2,72b73c5fd98f8a36 X-Google-Attributes: gid1038c2,public X-Google-Thread: 106ae0,72b73c5fd98f8a36 X-Google-Attributes: gid106ae0,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2004-04-04 13:48:37 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail From: selftrans@yandex.ru (Sergey Karavashkin) Newsgroups: sci.physics,sci.physics.electromag,alt.sci.physics.new-theories,fj.sci.matter,sci.physics.relativity Subject: Re: Gradient of potential function of dynamic field Date: 4 Apr 2004 13:48:37 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 34 Message-ID: <a42650fc.0404041248.39c33f9@posting.google.com> References: <a42650fc.0402011435.6e84feaa@posting.google.com> <a42650fc.0403121443.467ac642@posting.google.com> <slrnc54m9t.985.dubious@radioactivex.lebesque-al.net> <a42650fc.0403181447.619936b7@posting.google.com> <slrnc5odcb.5t.dubious@radioactivex.lebesque-al.net> <a42650fc.0403222157.33b67dc9@posting.google.com> <slrnc60ln7.7pq.dubious@radioactivex.lebesque-al.net> <a42650fc.0403271438.7849c392@posting.google.com> <slrnc6fdpf.1d4.dubious@radioactivex.lebesque-al.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: 193.111.16.83 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1081111717 17049 127.0.0.1 (4 Apr 2004 20:48:37 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 4 Apr 2004 20:48:37 +0000 (UTC)