🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: sci.physics
Article #15052

Re: Gradient of potential function of dynamic field

#15052
From: Bilge
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 03:54
22 lines
2427 bytes
 Sergey Karavashkin: 
 >
 >Bilge, don't dodge. You know, this paper has 27 pages, not 9. But not
 >in vain you are saying of 9 pages, as just in the 8th page of paper

  OK. Then change what I said to read:

   "Either your function is 27 pages long or I don't have to read
    27 pages to know what it is."
 
 >(p. 19 of the issue) you saw our formula (26).
 
  Not hardly. I looked at you index page. I didn't bother read
any of your article.

 >You saw it.
 
  Not unless your formula looks like a table of contents. Either post
the function of get lost. My guess is that you wrote an article trying
to give physical significance to an arithmetic error. If you had a
real result, you wouldn't hesitate to post 1 function rather than
post a lot of crap to cover for not having a function.
Technical Details
Message-ID: <slrnc8c18r.uq8.dubious@radioactivex.lebesque-al.net>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-01!sn-post-01!supernews.com!corp.supernews.com!dubious
References: <a42650fc.0402011435.6e84feaa@posting.google.com> <a42650fc.0403222157.33b67dc9@posting.google.com> <slrnc60ln7.7pq.dubious@radioactivex.lebesque-al.net> <a42650fc.0403271438.7849c392@posting.google.com> <slrnc6fdpf.1d4.dubious@radioactivex.lebesque-al.net> <a42650fc.0404041248.39c33f9@posting.google.com> <slrnc71lg5.4n5.dubious@radioactivex.lebesque-al.net> <a42650fc.0404090656.29847cbb@posting.google.com> <slrnc7dvm9.6ci.dubious@radioactivex.lebesque-al.net> <a42650fc.0404201339.712f1cba@posting.google.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 1038c2,72b73c5fd98f8a36
X-Google-Attributes: gid1038c2,public
X-Google-Thread: 1110fe,72b73c5fd98f8a36
X-Google-Attributes: gid1110fe,public
X-Google-Thread: 106ae0,72b73c5fd98f8a36
X-Google-Attributes: gid106ae0,public
X-Google-Thread: 10b271,72b73c5fd98f8a36
X-Google-Attributes: gid10b271,public
X-Google-Thread: 10f545,72b73c5fd98f8a36
X-Google-Attributes: gid10f545,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2004-04-20 20:55:00 PST
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-01!sn-post-01!supernews.com!corp.supernews.com!dubious
From: dubious@radioactivex.lebesque-al.net (Bilge)
Newsgroups: sci.physics,sci.physics.electromag,alt.sci.physics.new-theories,fj.sci.matter,sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: Gradient of potential function of dynamic field
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 03:54:59 -0000
Organization: k lnOmega
Message-ID: <slrnc8c18r.uq8.dubious@radioactivex.lebesque-al.net>
References: <a42650fc.0402011435.6e84feaa@posting.google.com> <a42650fc.0403222157.33b67dc9@posting.google.com> <slrnc60ln7.7pq.dubious@radioactivex.lebesque-al.net> <a42650fc.0403271438.7849c392@posting.google.com> <slrnc6fdpf.1d4.dubious@radioactivex.lebesque-al.net> <a42650fc.0404041248.39c33f9@posting.google.com> <slrnc71lg5.4n5.dubious@radioactivex.lebesque-al.net> <a42650fc.0404090656.29847cbb@posting.google.com> <slrnc7dvm9.6ci.dubious@radioactivex.lebesque-al.net> <a42650fc.0404201339.712f1cba@posting.google.com>
Reply-To: cranks@fghfgigtu.com
X-Newsreader: slrn (0.9.5.6 UNIX)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@supernews.com
Lines: 24