Article View: sci.physics
Article #15116Re: Maxwell's and Faraday's formulations of induction
From: suzysewnshow
Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2004 20:10
Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2004 20:10
24 lines
2599 bytes
2599 bytes
[snip] > > Sergey> > > > I reason that if no astronomer was present in Newton's era to correct > > > the manner in which Newton formatted his gravitational agenda by > > > unauthorised use of two incompatible astronomical views,I have no > > > reason to believe that it could be achieved in the present > > > climate.Astronomers previous to Flamsteed calculated orbits of planets > > > against the motion of the Earth,after Flamsteed it amounted to > > > calculating them against the background stars with Newton fudging as > > > much as possible by way of combining Roemer and Kepler seperate but > > > overlaping insights. I could not find the words *Saturation* or *Hysteresis* in your paper so am wondering how these well known effects were accounted for in the ferromagnetic cores used in your experiment. Your description sounds much like a fluxgate magnetometer so I would expect these can't be ignored. MAGNETIC PHENOMENA IN FERROMAGNETIC MATERIALS http://physics.nad.ru/Physics/English/mag_txt.htm http://www.mines.edu/fs_home/tboyd/GP311/MODULES/MAG/NOTES/fluxgate.html ------------------- Kind regards, Sue...
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<e0a23188.0408291210.35c7a06a@posting.google.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews2.google.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<a42650fc.0407111955.363f0bf7@posting.google.com> <a42650fc.0408080626.27047097@posting.google.com> <9d62a326.0408100051.37a3eca4@posting.google.com> <a42650fc.0408140220.2005f522@posting.google.com> <9d62a326.0408152216.7082ef2d@posting.google.com> <a42650fc.0408182223.13cc9cbf@posting.google.com> <273f8e06.0408190539.72e3a268@posting.google.com> <a42650fc.0408250930.395282b2@posting.google.com> <273f8e06.0408290537.33b990dd@posting.google.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 10b271,ce7d0bccd794dcef X-Google-Thread: 1110fe,ce7d0bccd794dcef X-Google-Thread: 1038c2,ce7d0bccd794dcef X-Google-Thread: 106ae0,ce7d0bccd794dcef X-Google-Attributes: gid10b271,gid1110fe,gid1038c2,gid106ae0,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews2.google.com!not-for-mail From: suzysewnshow@yahoo.com.au (suzysewnshow) Newsgroups: sci.physics,sci.physics.electromag,alt.sci.physics.new-theories,fj.sci.matter Subject: Re: Maxwell's and Faraday's formulations of induction Date: 29 Aug 2004 13:10:05 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 24 Message-ID: <e0a23188.0408291210.35c7a06a@posting.google.com> References: <a42650fc.0407111955.363f0bf7@posting.google.com> <a42650fc.0408080626.27047097@posting.google.com> <9d62a326.0408100051.37a3eca4@posting.google.com> <a42650fc.0408140220.2005f522@posting.google.com> <9d62a326.0408152216.7082ef2d@posting.google.com> <a42650fc.0408182223.13cc9cbf@posting.google.com> <273f8e06.0408190539.72e3a268@posting.google.com> <a42650fc.0408250930.395282b2@posting.google.com> <273f8e06.0408290537.33b990dd@posting.google.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 65.113.129.173 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1093810206 13029 127.0.0.1 (29 Aug 2004 20:10:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2004 20:10:06 +0000 (UTC)