🚀 go-pugleaf

None wrote:
> 
> Dear Colleagues,
> 
> Some time ago we published the paper
> 
> "On transverse Doppler effect in frames of classical formalism"
> 
> http://selftrans.narod.ru/v5_1/contents5rus.html#doppler
[snip]

If it isn't: given any achievable velocities V1 and V2 and any finite
lightspeed, the bound on the relative velocities of V1 and V2 as
viewed by any inertial observer cannot exceed

(V1 + V2)/[1 +(V1)(V2)/c^2]

This is transformation of velocities parallel to the direction of
motion. For velocities at an arbitrary angle theta, Jackson gives

u_parallel = (u'_parallel + v)/(1+(v dot u')/c^2)
u_perp = u'_perp/(gamma_v(1+(v dot u')/c^2))

<http://www.physics.umanitoba.ca/~souther/waves02/feb0402/sld011.htm>

Relativistic doppler shift,
http://www.mathpages.com/rr/s2-04/2-04.htm
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/relativ/reldop2.html
http://www.phys.ufl.edu/~rfield/PHY2061/images/chp39_2.pdf

then you are wrong.  If it is, then you are redundant.

-- 
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
 (Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf