🚀 go-pugleaf

"None" <selftrans@yandex.ru> wrote in message 
news:1121164075.088598.63020@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> Dear Colleagues,
>
> We are going on publishing the 5th volume of works of our laboratory
> with the paper
>
> " On reality of black holes "
>
> *Abstract*
>
> We will analyse the basic phenomenological and mathematical approaches
> of Relativity when having built the General theory of relativity. In
> particular, we will consider the ways, how Einstein derived the
> regularity of light velocity with respect to the value of gravity
> potential; how Schwarzschild derived the metric of stationary point
> black hole; how Landau made his derivation for a collapsing dust
> sphere; Oppenheimer's derivation for a collapse of dying star, as well
> as the features and incentives, how and why had Einstein introduced his
> lambda term.
> On the basis of analysis of the above approaches, we will show full
> inconsistency of the statements of problems to the corresponding
> processes in real physical systems, artificial mathematical
> transformations based on ignoring the logic sequence of formal
> mathematical derivation, on unfoundedly introduced ad libitum, doubtful
> postulates and on arbitrarily composed mathematical expressions.
>
> We hope much that the aspects analysed in this paper will be of help to
> the specialists who rely in their interpretations on the models of
> black holes to understand better the discrepancies of this theory.
> Enjoy reading
>
> http://selftrans.narod.ru/v5_2/contents5_2.html#blackhole
>
> Best to you all,
> Sergey B. Karavashkin
>
> Head Laboratory SELF
> 187 apt., 38 bldg.
> Prospect Gagarina
> Kharkov 61140
> Ukraine
>
> Phone: +38 (057) 73706624
> e-mail: selftrans@yandex.ru , selflab@mail.ru
> http://www.angelfire.com/la3/SELFlab/index.html
>

a short reading of the first two pages of this `paper` commends
the peer revue system which this has so obviously has not undergone.
Peer revue would have at least made it more readable to normal english 
readers.
Even if the ideas were valid or not.
Alasdair