Article View: sci.physics
Article #15196Re: Gradient of potential function of dynamic field
From: Sergey Karavashkin
Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2004 23:19
Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2004 23:19
95 lines
5777 bytes
5777 bytes
"Franz Heymann" <notfranz.heymann@btopenworld.com> wrote in message news:<c1ik59$k89$12@titan.btinternet.com>... > "Sergey Karavashkin" <selftrans@yandex.ru> wrote in message > news:a42650fc.0402241512.7788126e@posting.google.com... > > "Dirk Van de moortel" <dirkvandemoortel@hotmail.Thanks-NoSperm.com> wrote > in message news:<c12pae$cd7$1@reader11.wxs.nl>... > > > "Sergey Karavashkin" <selftrans@yandex.ru> wrote in message > news:a42650fc.0402161443.85012fb@posting.google.com... > > > > "Dirk Van de moortel" <dirkvandemoortel@ThankS-NO-SperM.hotmail.com> > wrote in message > news:<NHIVb.13987$pC3.12117@news.cpqcorp.net>... > > > > > "Sergey Karavashkin" <selftrans@yandex.ru> wrote in message > news:a42650fc.0402081450.153f158a@posting.google.com... > > > > > > thoovler@excite.com (Igor) wrote in message > news:<d434b6c6.0402020056.7de6d18b@posting.google.com>... > > > > > > > selftrans@yandex.ru (Sergey Karavashkin) wrote in message > news:<a42650fc.0402011435.6e84feaa@posting.google.com>... > > > > > > > > Dear Colleagues, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > We open the new volume > > > > > > > > > > > > [snip] > > > > You can additionally make sure that curl(grad(phi)) =/= 0 looking at > > our new dynamic animation of scalar potential produced by dynamic > > dipole, > > For *any* scalar function of position phi, it is universally true, as can be > proved in two lines of vector calculus, that > curl(grad(phi)) = 0 > > What am I missing? > > Franz Truly, Franz, you are one of not so many here whom I especially respect for your knowledge and skill. Unfortunately, our relations turned out so that we each time appeared on different sides of barricade and you refused to penetrate into the core of issue. I understand, if you go standard way in rigid frames of conventional formalism, the outcome curl(grad(phi)) = 0 is warranted. But the point is not so as it seems in conventional formalism. To make sure, please see the animation http://selftrans.narod.ru/agV.gif and determine by eye the integral over surface of selected volume, supposing the area of cross-section normal to the screen. I suspect, you will yield different values at different moments of time. That is the entrance to Minotaur's labyrinth. ;-) At due time you seemingly understood the feature of divergence theorem, "On longitudinal electromagnetic waves. Chapter 1. Lifting the bans" http://angelfire.lycos.com/la3/selftrans/archive/archive.html#long and "Transformation of divergence theorem in dynamical fields" http://angelfire.lycos.com/la3/selftrans/archive/archive.html#div This is why I suggest to start from this reference point for further understanding. After this we have to leave aside all habitual standards and scrutinize the essence of computations as such, however unusual they seem. Please read our "Theorem of curl of a potential vector in dynamical fields" http://angelfire.lycos.com/la3/selftrans/v2_2/contents.html#curl You will see its value in dynamic fields irrespectively of potential function of flux. After this read please our "On gradient of potential function of dynamic field" http://selftrans.narod.ru/v4_1/grad/grad01 and determine, to what is it equal in dynamic fields. After this all, connect the results - you will yield what I'm saying about. ;-) It is also important, if you see the animation where I presented for Dirk the diagram of scalar potential of dynamic dipole http://selftrans.narod.ru/agfig4.gif and look at the area of perpendicular to the axis of dipole, you will see that gradient not always is along the field propagation. In this area it is perpendicular to the propagation. It is important in view that when perpendicularly oriented, the curl of this DYNAMIC vector is not zero. Of course, this is far from all, but you will make a great step to understanding. If my problems with posting to Google are not growing (by some reason, last time their machine rejects my posts, replying to the very first, "too much letters for today"), I will gladly discuss this subject further with you. Kind regards, Sergey
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<a42650fc.0403011519.21d7958e@posting.google.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<a42650fc.0402011435.6e84feaa@posting.google.com> <d434b6c6.0402020056.7de6d18b@posting.google.com> <a42650fc.0402081450.153f158a@posting.google.com> <NHIVb.13987$pC3.12117@news.cpqcorp.net> <a42650fc.0402161443.85012fb@posting.google.com> <c12pae$cd7$1@reader11.wxs.nl> <a42650fc.0402241512.7788126e@posting.google.com> <c1ik59$k89$12@titan.btinternet.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10b271,72b73c5fd98f8a36 X-Google-Attributes: gid10b271,public X-Google-Thread: 1038c2,72b73c5fd98f8a36 X-Google-Attributes: gid1038c2,public X-Google-Thread: 10f545,72b73c5fd98f8a36 X-Google-Attributes: gid10f545,public X-Google-Thread: 1110fe,72b73c5fd98f8a36 X-Google-Attributes: gid1110fe,public X-Google-Thread: 106ae0,72b73c5fd98f8a36 X-Google-Attributes: gid106ae0,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2004-03-01 15:19:40 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail From: selftrans@yandex.ru (Sergey Karavashkin) Newsgroups: sci.physics,sci.physics.electromag,alt.sci.physics.new-theories,fj.sci.matter,sci.physics.relativity Subject: Re: Gradient of potential function of dynamic field Date: 1 Mar 2004 15:19:39 -0800 Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 95 Message-ID: <a42650fc.0403011519.21d7958e@posting.google.com> References: <a42650fc.0402011435.6e84feaa@posting.google.com> <d434b6c6.0402020056.7de6d18b@posting.google.com> <a42650fc.0402081450.153f158a@posting.google.com> <NHIVb.13987$pC3.12117@news.cpqcorp.net> <a42650fc.0402161443.85012fb@posting.google.com> <c12pae$cd7$1@reader11.wxs.nl> <a42650fc.0402241512.7788126e@posting.google.com> <c1ik59$k89$12@titan.btinternet.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 195.177.112.246 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1078183180 24724 127.0.0.1 (1 Mar 2004 23:19:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 23:19:40 +0000 (UTC)