🚀 go-pugleaf

selftrans@yandex.ru (Sergey Karavashkin) wrote in message news:<a42650fc.0402261456.625ee662@posting.google.com>...
> Dear Colleagues,
> 
> As I promised, I sent your comments to the author of discussed paper,
> N.K. Noskov. Today I have available his reply to you all. We strongly
> disagree with his opinion, we already told it here, and we will state
> our substantiation of planets formation in the third part of our
> Chapter 2 which we are preparing for publication. None the less,
> respecting the right of author, we post you his notice.
> 
> Sergey
> 
> ****************
> 
> COSMOGONIC HYPOTHESIS by N.K. Noskov
> 
> Interesting, what do think the cosmologists when observing the comets,
> fireballs, meteorites? What do they suppose, seeing the "rains" of
> meteors that each year at the same time fall onto the Earth? Don't
> they think these pieces of iron, stone either ice have been ejected by
> some volcano on the Earth or Mars? Don't they forward a hypothesis
> that Cosmos throws these stones from the far emptiness?
> 
> Would not it be more logic to suppose that the ejected matter -
> particles, nuclei and atoms - is the product of star development? We
> permanently see by our own eyes the cases corroborating such
> hypothesis: our own star - Sun permanently ejects the substance in the
> state of plasma to the space through its dark spots.
> 
> Some part of ejected matter returns to Sun, a part flies away to the
> far cosmos, away from the Sun system, and a part (most important for
> us) settles in the stable orbits as the rings (such as Saturn and
> Jupiter have) in which the planets habit [1]. Already in the rings,
> the matter unifies into conglomerates. If propitious conditions, when
> these rings are distanced enough and do not interfere with each other,
> there originate the nuclei of planets. When the nucleus already has
> arisen, it gradually absorbs all the mass of ring, replicating in
> smaller scale the initial development of star: its heating and
> creation of electron envelope [2].
> 
> The laws of mechanics are such that the ellipticity of the body and
> possibly inclination of its orbit [3] depend on its mass and speed.
> Therefore, being seemingly in the same orbit with the Earth,
> meteorites collide with it only in two opposite points of its annual
> revolution. The earth (and all planets)  absorbs the substance of ring
> and increases in size.
> 
> When the planet has formed, it created the potential field around it;
> this means, stable orbits appeared around it, and in them also can
> settle the matter elected by Sun and, possibly, by planet, when it was
> melted. So the satellites of planets began to form...
> 
> In the past, when the Sun was larger, its dark spots ejected much more
> plasma into cosmos (Schatzman). So formation of rings in the stable
> orbits, and then planets of them, occurred very intensively.
> 
> References:
> 
> 1.N.K. Noskov. Stability of a solar system.
> http://n-t.org/tpe/ng/uss.htm
> 2.N.K. Noskov. The cosmological cosmogonic nebular hypothesis. 
> http://n-t.org/tpe/ng/kgng.htm
> 3.N.K. Noskov. The phenomenon of retarded of potential.
> http://n-t.org/tpe/ng/yzp.htm


Dear Colleagues, it is so strange that no one replied.

Sergey