Article View: sci.physics
Article #15208Re: Gradient of potential function of dynamic field
From: Sergey Karavashkin
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 22:47
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 22:47
34 lines
3417 bytes
3417 bytes
thoovler@excite.com (Igor) wrote in message news:<d434b6c6.0403012311.1a575292@posting.google.com>... > selftrans@yandex.ru (Sergey Karavashkin) wrote in message news:<a42650fc.0403011524.58db9e55@posting.google.com>... > > thoovler@excite.com (Igor) wrote in message news:<d434b6c6.0402101220.44634b7a@posting.google.com>... > > > selftrans@yandex.ru (Sergey Karavashkin) wrote in message news:<a42650fc.0402081450.153f158a@posting.google.com>... > > > > thoovler@excite.com (Igor) wrote in message news:<d434b6c6.0402020056.7de6d18b@posting.google.com>... > > > > > selftrans@yandex.ru (Sergey Karavashkin) wrote in message news:<a42650fc.0402011435.6e84feaa@posting.google.com>... > > > > > > Dear Colleagues, > > > > > > > > > > > > We open the new volume > > > > > > > > [snip] > No matter how long-winded your explanations get, please bear in mind > that you cannot defeat the fact that curl grad ALWAYS vanishes. Till > you accept that fact, any attempted deviation from it will lead you > down a long and worthless path. Maybe you are attempting to > theoretically explain some observable effect, but I'm having trouble > following your arguments. In any case, maintaining that curl grad is > anything but zero won't get you there. It's a dead notion. Good > luck. Dear Igor, This means, you have not read my long-winded explanations, neither our paper? You even did not click the animation suggested to your attention? You have considered nothing of my arguments? You even did not understand, about what do I tell you. But I'm afraid, I will not go on trying to prove you something. Please read my today post to Franz Heymann and try to help him to determine the circulation of vector in a very simple model. Then you possibly will understand, where the deadlock is namely - of course, if you want to understand it. Sergey
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<a42650fc.0403121447.3af8a34f@posting.google.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<a42650fc.0402011435.6e84feaa@posting.google.com> <d434b6c6.0402020056.7de6d18b@posting.google.com> <a42650fc.0402081450.153f158a@posting.google.com> <d434b6c6.0402101220.44634b7a@posting.google.com> <a42650fc.0403011524.58db9e55@posting.google.com> <d434b6c6.0403012311.1a575292@posting.google.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1038c2,72b73c5fd98f8a36 X-Google-Attributes: gid1038c2,public X-Google-Thread: 106ae0,72b73c5fd98f8a36 X-Google-Attributes: gid106ae0,public X-Google-Thread: 10f545,72b73c5fd98f8a36 X-Google-Attributes: gid10f545,public X-Google-Thread: 10b271,72b73c5fd98f8a36 X-Google-Attributes: gid10b271,public X-Google-Thread: 1110fe,72b73c5fd98f8a36 X-Google-Attributes: gid1110fe,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2004-03-12 14:47:18 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail From: selftrans@yandex.ru (Sergey Karavashkin) Newsgroups: sci.physics,sci.physics.electromag,alt.sci.physics.new-theories,fj.sci.matter,sci.physics.relativity Subject: Re: Gradient of potential function of dynamic field Date: 12 Mar 2004 14:47:17 -0800 Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 34 Message-ID: <a42650fc.0403121447.3af8a34f@posting.google.com> References: <a42650fc.0402011435.6e84feaa@posting.google.com> <d434b6c6.0402020056.7de6d18b@posting.google.com> <a42650fc.0402081450.153f158a@posting.google.com> <d434b6c6.0402101220.44634b7a@posting.google.com> <a42650fc.0403011524.58db9e55@posting.google.com> <d434b6c6.0403012311.1a575292@posting.google.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 195.177.112.246 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1079131638 7056 127.0.0.1 (12 Mar 2004 22:47:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 22:47:18 +0000 (UTC)