Article View: sci.physics
Article #15217Re: Gradient of potential function of dynamic field
From: Igor
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 03:08
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 03:08
42 lines
3988 bytes
3988 bytes
selftrans@yandex.ru (Sergey Karavashkin) wrote in message news:<a42650fc.0403121447.3af8a34f@posting.google.com>... > thoovler@excite.com (Igor) wrote in message news:<d434b6c6.0403012311.1a575292@posting.google.com>... > > selftrans@yandex.ru (Sergey Karavashkin) wrote in message news:<a42650fc.0403011524.58db9e55@posting.google.com>... > > > thoovler@excite.com (Igor) wrote in message news:<d434b6c6.0402101220.44634b7a@posting.google.com>... > > > > selftrans@yandex.ru (Sergey Karavashkin) wrote in message news:<a42650fc.0402081450.153f158a@posting.google.com>... > > > > > thoovler@excite.com (Igor) wrote in message news:<d434b6c6.0402020056.7de6d18b@posting.google.com>... > > > > > > selftrans@yandex.ru (Sergey Karavashkin) wrote in message news:<a42650fc.0402011435.6e84feaa@posting.google.com>... > > > > > > > Dear Colleagues, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > We open the new volume > > > > > > > > > > [snip] > > > No matter how long-winded your explanations get, please bear in mind > > that you cannot defeat the fact that curl grad ALWAYS vanishes. Till > > you accept that fact, any attempted deviation from it will lead you > > down a long and worthless path. Maybe you are attempting to > > theoretically explain some observable effect, but I'm having trouble > > following your arguments. In any case, maintaining that curl grad is > > anything but zero won't get you there. It's a dead notion. Good > > luck. > > Dear Igor, > > This means, you have not read my long-winded explanations, neither our > paper? You even did not click the animation suggested to your > attention? You have considered nothing of my arguments? You even did > not understand, about what do I tell you. But I'm afraid, I will not > go on trying to prove you something. Please read my today post to > Franz Heymann and try to help him to determine the circulation of > vector in a very simple model. Then you possibly will understand, > where the deadlock is namely - of course, if you want to understand > it. > > Sergey Actually, I looked it over a couple of times. Frankly, I couldn't really find anything wrong with the flow of your arguments. My take is that there is a mistake in there somewhere. At least there would have to be, since curl grad always vanishes. But I still can't locate where your argument goes wrong. Maybe I'll look at it once more.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<d434b6c6.0403141908.1c7ce314@posting.google.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!postnews2.google.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<a42650fc.0402011435.6e84feaa@posting.google.com> <d434b6c6.0402020056.7de6d18b@posting.google.com> <a42650fc.0402081450.153f158a@posting.google.com> <d434b6c6.0402101220.44634b7a@posting.google.com> <a42650fc.0403011524.58db9e55@posting.google.com> <d434b6c6.0403012311.1a575292@posting.google.com> <a42650fc.0403121447.3af8a34f@posting.google.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10b271,72b73c5fd98f8a36 X-Google-Attributes: gid10b271,public X-Google-Thread: 106ae0,72b73c5fd98f8a36 X-Google-Attributes: gid106ae0,public X-Google-Thread: 10f545,72b73c5fd98f8a36 X-Google-Attributes: gid10f545,public X-Google-Thread: 1038c2,72b73c5fd98f8a36 X-Google-Attributes: gid1038c2,public X-Google-Thread: 1110fe,72b73c5fd98f8a36 X-Google-Attributes: gid1110fe,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2004-03-14 19:08:14 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!postnews2.google.com!not-for-mail From: thoovler@excite.com (Igor) Newsgroups: sci.physics,sci.physics.electromag,alt.sci.physics.new-theories,fj.sci.matter,sci.physics.relativity Subject: Re: Gradient of potential function of dynamic field Date: 14 Mar 2004 19:08:14 -0800 Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 42 Message-ID: <d434b6c6.0403141908.1c7ce314@posting.google.com> References: <a42650fc.0402011435.6e84feaa@posting.google.com> <d434b6c6.0402020056.7de6d18b@posting.google.com> <a42650fc.0402081450.153f158a@posting.google.com> <d434b6c6.0402101220.44634b7a@posting.google.com> <a42650fc.0403011524.58db9e55@posting.google.com> <d434b6c6.0403012311.1a575292@posting.google.com> <a42650fc.0403121447.3af8a34f@posting.google.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 69.162.198.35 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1079320094 20569 127.0.0.1 (15 Mar 2004 03:08:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 03:08:14 +0000 (UTC)