🚀 go-pugleaf

John Anderson <ande452@attglobal.net> wrote in message news:<3FB83B47.3D20EF97@attglobal.net>...
> Sergey Karavashkin wrote:
> 
> > John Anderson <ande452@attglobal.net> wrote in message news:<3FB5A624.D8618682@attglobal.net>...
> > > Sergey Karavashkin wrote:
> > >
> > > > Dear Colleagues,
> > > >
> > > > We published a new paper
> > > >
> > > > " Several experiments studying dynamic magnetic field "
> > > >
> > > > in our journal "SELF Transactions", volume 3 (2003), issue 1
> > > >
> > >
> > > Wow.  What power!  You peer review yourself.
> > >
> > > In common terms, you're a mental masturbator.
> > >
> > > John Anderson
> >
> > I feel, you are font of this paper. You have no other arguments and
> > you understood what is your own knowledge of pitecantrop worthy.
> >
> 
> I realize that English may not be your native language.  But I can'trespond to something that is not
> only incoherent, but which contains
> stuff like "pitecantrop worthy" which seems to be your own
> creation.
> 
> John Anderson


John,

Had you an intention to respond sensibly? ;-) Seemingly, you began
accusing me of self-reviewing and brought to NG the lexicon of cheap
pubs. True, I don't know, do you grasp the difference between the
abstract and review? ;-) I can say only, this is not your invention -
to clutch at the slip of opponent's pen, while understanding full lack
of own arguments. Yes, I was grammatically mistaken (the meaning
remained clear) - was it so important as your prejudice and cheap
jargon in communication with a colleague? Would you first learn the
ethics of behaviour, then learn a little the methodology of physics,
then get in discussion with your hoofs.

Sergey.