Article View: sci.physics
Article #15250Re: New Year question from Leo
From: Sergey Karavashkin
Date: Sun, 04 Jan 2004 22:24
Date: Sun, 04 Jan 2004 22:24
48 lines
3478 bytes
3478 bytes
nulldev00@aol.com (Edward Green) wrote in message news:<2a0cceff.0312281924.7853d32f@posting.google.com>... > selftrans@yandex.ru (Sergey Karavashkin) wrote in message news:<a42650fc.0312281440.1ee617e7@posting.google.com>... > > selftrans@yandex.ru (Sergey Karavashkin) wrote in message news:<a42650fc.0312231529.65b841bd@posting.google.com>... > > > Dear colleagues, > > > > > > Recently I received the following message and sent the following > > > respond on my divergence theorem in dynamic fields, > > > > > > http://angelfire.lycos.com/la3/selftrans/archive/archive.html#div > > > > > > It might be of your great interest. Please read it with formulas and > > > figure at > > > > > > http://selftrans.narod.ru/archive/div/leo1/leo1.html > > > > > > What is your opinion? > > > > > > Thank you, > > > > > > Sergey > > > > > > Well, colleagues. More than 200 of you have read this material, and no > > one replied? Fine statistics! > > Does that mean a like number were subjected to the pop-up ad? Dear Edward, I hardly can understand what you mean, but the statistics is such as I wrote. Is it pop-up or not, I hardly can understand. Not this is the main. The main is that on this web page I basically changed the principal equation of radio physics. And this new equation fully corresponds to the theorem proven by mine. This theorem is incompatible with the current system of Maxwell equations. Should I be wrong in my proof, how much noise would I hear!... They all kept silence. It means, I'm right, and they all have understood it. Respectful Leo in that number. After this they can much discuss electrodynamic issues on their threads, relying on Maxwell equations. Flag to their hands. ;-) After this they can speak much of Einstein's electrodynamics, of photon theory, QED, QFT etc. True, even without it, these theories didn't work, colleagues only wished them working. These theories have to be built basically otherwise. And the more they will keep silence, the less is their chance to participate in this work. Kind regards, Sergey.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<a42650fc.0401041424.31edb781@posting.google.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<a42650fc.0312231529.65b841bd@posting.google.com> <a42650fc.0312281440.1ee617e7@posting.google.com> <2a0cceff.0312281924.7853d32f@posting.google.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1038c2,ef7eb0d662ead2d4 X-Google-Attributes: gid1038c2,public X-Google-Thread: 1110fe,ef7eb0d662ead2d4 X-Google-Attributes: gid1110fe,public X-Google-Thread: 106ae0,ef7eb0d662ead2d4 X-Google-Attributes: gid106ae0,public X-Google-Thread: 10b271,ef7eb0d662ead2d4 X-Google-Attributes: gid10b271,public X-Google-Thread: 10f545,ef7eb0d662ead2d4 X-Google-Attributes: gid10f545,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2004-01-04 14:24:17 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail From: selftrans@yandex.ru (Sergey Karavashkin) Newsgroups: sci.physics,sci.physics.electromag,alt.sci.physics.new-theories,fj.sci.matter,sci.physics.relativity Subject: Re: New Year question from Leo Date: 4 Jan 2004 14:24:16 -0800 Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 48 Message-ID: <a42650fc.0401041424.31edb781@posting.google.com> References: <a42650fc.0312231529.65b841bd@posting.google.com> <a42650fc.0312281440.1ee617e7@posting.google.com> <2a0cceff.0312281924.7853d32f@posting.google.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 195.177.112.246 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1073255057 1729 127.0.0.1 (4 Jan 2004 22:24:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2004 22:24:17 +0000 (UTC)