Re: Notes on physical Absolute

Article View: sci.physics

Article #15258

#15258

From: Hayek
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2003 10:46

48 lines
2829 bytes


Uncle Al wrote:

> Sergey Karavashkin wrote:
> [snip]
> 
> 
>>In fact, relation between the Absolute and Relative is determined by
>>the permanently moving edge of our knowledge and necessity in some
>>basic reference frame which would allow us to generalise in the utmost
>>correct way our particular results of studying the physical phenomena.
>>So at every stage of physics development, the concept of the absolute
>>reference frame reflects the highest level of knowledge of the stage.
>>At the today level it would be quite admissible to use, as an approach
>>to the absolute reference system, some system related to the aether in
>>the surrounding us near space.
>>
> [snip]
> 
> I have hermetically isolated three orthogonal accelerometers
> (mechanical inertial or ring gyro optical phase at your whim, or three
> of each).  What they sense is absolute.  Everything else is relative. 
> It is that simple.
> 
> Pick your property, stick your detector(s) into a hermetically sealed
> box.  You either get a signal or not.  It is that simple.  Every other
> embellishment is crap.  The aether is particularly loathsome,


So, *HOW* do you think your rotational (and 
unidirectional) accelerometers work ?

Bewitched by Harry Potter ?


UA is simple.


Hayek.




-- 
The small particles wave at
the big stars and get noticed.
:-)

Technical Details

Message-ID: <3E365F7A.9070703@nospam.xs4all.nl>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!newsfeed.vmunix.org!news2.euro.net!news2.euro.net!transit.news.xs4all.nl!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!xs4all!rhinewceros.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail

References: <1305a9da.0301261524.4d6171c7@posting.google.com> <3E3478B6.255619D5@hate.spam.net>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 1038c2,cfdcd85d3ce06e78
X-Google-Attributes: gid1038c2,public
X-Google-Thread: 111f18,cfdcd85d3ce06e78
X-Google-Attributes: gid111f18,public
X-Google-Thread: 10f545,cfdcd85d3ce06e78
X-Google-Attributes: gid10f545,public
X-Google-Thread: 10b271,cfdcd85d3ce06e78
X-Google-Attributes: gid10b271,public
X-Google-Thread: 106ae0,cfdcd85d3ce06e78
X-Google-Attributes: gid106ae0,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-01-28 02:45:58 PST
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!newsfeed.vmunix.org!news2.euro.net!news2.euro.net!transit.news.xs4all.nl!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!xs4all!rhinewceros.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Message-ID: <3E365F7A.9070703@nospam.xs4all.nl>
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2003 11:46:18 +0100
From: Hayek <hayektt@nospam.xs4all.nl>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:0.9.4) Gecko/20011128 Netscape6/6.2.1
X-Accept-Language: en-us
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity,alt.sci.physics.new-theories,alt.consciousness,fj.sci.matter
Subject: Re: Notes on physical Absolute
References: <1305a9da.0301261524.4d6171c7@posting.google.com> <3E3478B6.255619D5@hate.spam.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 49
NNTP-Posting-Host: 195.144.89.8
X-Trace: 1043750786 dreader4.news.xs4all.nl 136 195.144.89.8:42109

Reply to Parent Message