🚀 go-pugleaf

Uncle Al <UncleAl0@hate.spam.net> wrote in message news:<3E615017.8BE13E1D@hate.spam.net>...
Dear Al,

You are absolutely right in your criticism, but both in philosophy and
in science a direct path not always is the shortest. We have to deduce
the persistence of spiral galaxies from something, yes? Why not
beginning from more simple?

Kind regards,

Sergey.

P.S. 1) By the way, someone here attempts to disclose your incognito.
I don't follow, but from the very first seeing your URL I'm
interesting, hasn't Ivan Mazepa any concern to you? Please feel free
to do not reply, if you don't want. ;-)

2) My co-author also wished to reply you. Please see below her reply
which in essence coincides with mine, but is wider and more specific.

Sergey.

Thank you, Uncle Al, for good response and attentive reading.

You are absolutely right! A thousand year and a half a handicapped
grasshopper helplessly crawled and tried to grow its torn legs. Just
think, heliocentric system, algebra, geometry, trigonometry, harmonic
analysis, engineering, electricity, chemistry, selection and many,
many other things were created thousands years ago. Should each time
as the grasshopper grew its legs they were not torn again, the
super-materials, atomic power, computers, refractors, cosmic stations
might appear a thousand years earlier, and today we would have the
Galaxy at our disposal, just as our own kitchen. Imagine, the mankind
would always have a resource of development - it means, wars and
rubbery would be unnecessary. Milliards people wouldn't perish not for
a pinch of snuff, and their creations wouldn't be destroyed without
sense.

However, the mankind does not gain wisdom from past mistakes. Of
course, today not Aristotle but Einstein is the symbol of One True,
but the development is the same impeded and the scientists are
persecuted (13 scientists discharged from Pulkovo observatory,
persecution of Professor Denisov and many others); the same predatory
wars 'for the sake if Idea' as Crusades.

There is a brilliant film "Kin-dza-dza!" by G. Danelia. One galaxy has
conquered another and then was conquered by third. They established a
strongly differential society, but in indigence and mediocrity, among
ruins and degradation, the class difference expressed only in the
colour of trousers, and who possessed a match, became almighty in the
eyes of all others. To obtain the trousers of 'higher' colour, people
killed each other and sacrificed their lives, but one couldn't steal a
match, one could only to bring its possessor to the necessity to give
it. The Earthman says, "Why you kill? Let us fly to Earth, there are
any trousers and multitude matches!" - "Why! Whoever will dress green
trousers?! Whoever will have a match?! Not for the world!"

The most funny that in the draft version of our paper there were an
opus from which your idea was seen. We excluded 'the emotions',
enumerated only sound doctrines, omitting the gaps and delusions - but
you read between the lines, you understood, where a great piece of
history has been withdrawn and why, and you told just the thing!

Now concerning your question. You see, today the fault-finding
analysis is out of fashion again, and colleagues prefer to improvise.
The light velocity, BB, black holes and anti-holes - what a firework!
And how easy! True, doesn't work. Of course, everyone wants to have
the space and depths in his disposal, to know and possess everything.
But you should give them a ready device and say, which button they'll
press - and they will say, this corroborates the black holes theory
and you have no concern.

The spirals origin and stability is actually the issue of issues. As
we wrote in our recent paper "Notes on physical Absolute"

http://angelfire.lycos.com/la3/selftrans/v3_1/contents3.html#absolute

we have first to build the dynamic theory of gravity field and to
substantiate some properties of aether to be more ready to answer your
question. We are involved in some of these auxiliary issues.
Specifically, please look through our paper in which we consider
dynamic spirals in the complex form:

"On complex functions analyticity"

http://angelfire.lycos.com/la3/selftrans/v2_1/contents.html#complex

Still it is too far from the answer, it's only a small part of
necessary maths, and only the very beginning of it, which would enable
us in some future to work with spirals. But possibly, as a result of
our long way we will approach the answer to your question and some
others. We only see, how we can clear at the today level of knowledge
some important aspects of formation of the Earth and some other
celestial bodies. That what you have read is only an introductory
survey. The math will begin in the next chapters.

Respectfully yours,

Olga.