🚀 go-pugleaf

shrikanthas@yahoo.com (Shrikantha S. Shastry) wrote in message news:<92a87ac5.0304020124.369ed6bf@posting.google.com>...
> selflab@go.com (Sergey Karavashkin) wrote in message news:<1305a9da.0304011315.55fbd920@posting.google.com>...
> > shrikanthas@yahoo.com (Shrikantha S. Shastry) wrote in message news:<92a87ac5.0303292225.2f8fc42f@posting.google.com>...

> Well, my response was a general statement about the nature of the
> universe which is ilusory. This evaluation, if my link above is
> followed, is done with respect to its reality, the singularity. While
> the unobservable singularity is real, its observable universe has to
> be unreal or illusory. There is an unbridgeable gap between the
> unobservable singularity and the observable universe separating them
> out as the reality and the illusory.  And when the universe is
> illusory the consequences mentioned above are inevitable.
> 
> In other words, the evaluation of the universe as illusory is indeed
> because of the identification of the basically important singularity
> as the reality which has been approximated, avoided or ignored
> completely in the history of science. How can the inherent singularity
> or the essential consciousness be ignored in the rational advancement
> of science?

It seems like you are mixing the reality with our abstracted image of
this reality. The singularities are just absent in nature. They appear
in our models when we neglect the particulars. This is why there
appear the infinite resonances in vibrant systems, infinite forces of
interaction among the point charges, infinite propagation velocities
in the Coulomb law, smooth edges between the surfaces etc. These
weren't ignored a least in the history of science, or you badly know
its history. Indeed, it's your pleasure to play words and to wag a
peacocks' tail, using the double sense and leaning your elbows against
the limited scope of science. But such game is fruitless, except of,
maybe, one more attempt to salvage the Relativity. However in
accordance with GR the universe is closed. Or such 'trifle' is
indifferent for you? Well, the classic theory has no need in your
illusiveness, as it deals with the physical revelations of processes
in the nature. Though this 'trifle' is also indifferent to you. You
want - you think out the laws of nature! Isn't it so?

Well, what concern the physics has to it?

Sergey.