Article View: sci.physics
Article #15298Re: New Year question from Leo
From: Harry
Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2004 08:39
Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2004 08:39
27 lines
2561 bytes
2561 bytes
"Greg Neill" <gneillREM@OVE.netcom.ca> wrote in message news:ZjfKb.74347$by2.859190@wagner.videotron.net... > "Harry" <harald.vanlintel@epfl.ch> wrote in message > news:3ff969fe$1@epflnews.epfl.ch... > > > > "Franz Heymann" <notfranz.heymann@btopenworld.com> wrote in message > > news:btbcc0$qri$5@titan.btinternet.com... > > > > > > "Sergey Karavashkin" <selftrans@yandex.ru> wrote in message > > > news:a42650fc.0401041424.31edb781@posting.google.com... > > > > > > [snip > > > > > > . This theorem is > > > > incompatible with the current system of Maxwell equations. > > > > > > Then you are a crackpot. > > > > Your logic labels Einstein a crackpot... > > Einstein's equations are wholly compatible with Maxwell's. Except for low velocities, Einstein's theorems are incompatible with Newton's equations. Similarly, Ampere's equations are partially incompatible with those of Maxwell.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<3ffa73fa$1@epflnews.epfl.ch>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!newsfeed2.dallas1.level3.net!news.level3.com!news-out.visi.com!petbe.visi.com!news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!irazu.switch.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!switch.ch!epflnews.epfl.ch!not-for-mailReferences:
<a42650fc.0312231529.65b841bd@posting.google.com> <a42650fc.0312281440.1ee617e7@posting.google.com> <2a0cceff.0312281924.7853d32f@posting.google.com> <a42650fc.0401041424.31edb781@posting.google.com> <btbcc0$qri$5@titan.btinternet.com> <3ff969fe$1@epflnews.epfl.ch> <ZjfKb.74347$by2.859190@wagner.videotron.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10b271,ef7eb0d662ead2d4 X-Google-Attributes: gid10b271,public X-Google-Thread: 1038c2,ef7eb0d662ead2d4 X-Google-Attributes: gid1038c2,public X-Google-Thread: 1110fe,ef7eb0d662ead2d4 X-Google-Attributes: gid1110fe,public X-Google-Thread: 10f545,ef7eb0d662ead2d4 X-Google-Attributes: gid10f545,public X-Google-Thread: 106ae0,ef7eb0d662ead2d4 X-Google-Attributes: gid106ae0,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2004-01-06 00:38:21 PST From: "Harry" <harald.vanlintel@epfl.ch> Newsgroups: sci.physics,sci.physics.electromag,alt.sci.physics.new-theories,fj.sci.matter,sci.physics.relativity References: <a42650fc.0312231529.65b841bd@posting.google.com> <a42650fc.0312281440.1ee617e7@posting.google.com> <2a0cceff.0312281924.7853d32f@posting.google.com> <a42650fc.0401041424.31edb781@posting.google.com> <btbcc0$qri$5@titan.btinternet.com> <3ff969fe$1@epflnews.epfl.ch> <ZjfKb.74347$by2.859190@wagner.videotron.net> Subject: Re: New Year question from Leo Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2004 09:39:53 +0100 Lines: 29 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4927.1200 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4927.1200 NNTP-Posting-Host: imspc28.epfl.ch Message-ID: <3ffa73fa$1@epflnews.epfl.ch> X-Trace: epflnews.epfl.ch 1073378298 128.178.153.55 (6 Jan 2004 09:38:18 +0200) Organization: EPFL Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!newsfeed2.dallas1.level3.net!news.level3.com!news-out.visi.com!petbe.visi.com!news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!irazu.switch.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!switch.ch!epflnews.epfl.ch!not-for-mail