Article View: sci.physics
Article #15303Re: New Year question from Leo
From: Franz Heymann
Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2004 19:14
Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2004 19:14
37 lines
3292 bytes
3292 bytes
"Harry" <harald.vanlintel@epfl.ch> wrote in message news:3ffa73fa$1@epflnews.epfl.ch... > > "Greg Neill" <gneillREM@OVE.netcom.ca> wrote in message > news:ZjfKb.74347$by2.859190@wagner.videotron.net... > > "Harry" <harald.vanlintel@epfl.ch> wrote in message > > news:3ff969fe$1@epflnews.epfl.ch... > > > > > > "Franz Heymann" <notfranz.heymann@btopenworld.com> wrote in message > > > news:btbcc0$qri$5@titan.btinternet.com... > > > > > > > > "Sergey Karavashkin" <selftrans@yandex.ru> wrote in message > > > > news:a42650fc.0401041424.31edb781@posting.google.com... > > > > > > > > [snip > > > > > > > > . This theorem is > > > > > incompatible with the current system of Maxwell equations. > > > > > > > > Then you are a crackpot. > > > > > > Your logic labels Einstein a crackpot... > > > > Einstein's equations are wholly compatible with Maxwell's. > > Except for low velocities, Einstein's theorems are incompatible with > Newton's equations. > Similarly, Ampere's equations are partially incompatible with those of > Maxwell. The argument is about whether Maxwells equations and Special Relativity are compatible with one another. They are. In fact it was a peculiarity of Maxwell's equations which led to the development of SR. SR dxplained that peculiarity. Franz
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<btf1dj$hqp$3@hercules.btinternet.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!news2.google.com!newsfeed2.dallas1.level3.net!news.level3.com!news-out.visi.com!petbe.visi.com!news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!npeer.de.kpn-eurorings.net!news.uni-stuttgart.de!carbon.eu.sun.com!btnet-feed5!btnet!news.btopenworld.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<a42650fc.0312231529.65b841bd@posting.google.com> <a42650fc.0312281440.1ee617e7@posting.google.com> <2a0cceff.0312281924.7853d32f@posting.google.com> <a42650fc.0401041424.31edb781@posting.google.com> <btbcc0$qri$5@titan.btinternet.com> <3ff969fe$1@epflnews.epfl.ch> <ZjfKb.74347$by2.859190@wagner.videotron.net> <3ffa73fa$1@epflnews.epfl.ch>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1038c2,ef7eb0d662ead2d4 X-Google-Attributes: gid1038c2,public X-Google-Thread: 1110fe,ef7eb0d662ead2d4 X-Google-Attributes: gid1110fe,public X-Google-Thread: 10b271,ef7eb0d662ead2d4 X-Google-Attributes: gid10b271,public X-Google-Thread: 10f545,ef7eb0d662ead2d4 X-Google-Attributes: gid10f545,public X-Google-Thread: 106ae0,ef7eb0d662ead2d4 X-Google-Attributes: gid106ae0,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2004-01-06 11:15:03 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!news2.google.com!newsfeed2.dallas1.level3.net!news.level3.com!news-out.visi.com!petbe.visi.com!news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!npeer.de.kpn-eurorings.net!news.uni-stuttgart.de!carbon.eu.sun.com!btnet-feed5!btnet!news.btopenworld.com!not-for-mail From: "Franz Heymann" <notfranz.heymann@btopenworld.com> Newsgroups: sci.physics,sci.physics.electromag,alt.sci.physics.new-theories,fj.sci.matter,sci.physics.relativity Subject: Re: New Year question from Leo Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2004 19:14:08 +0000 (UTC) Organization: BT Openworld Lines: 39 Message-ID: <btf1dj$hqp$3@hercules.btinternet.com> References: <a42650fc.0312231529.65b841bd@posting.google.com> <a42650fc.0312281440.1ee617e7@posting.google.com> <2a0cceff.0312281924.7853d32f@posting.google.com> <a42650fc.0401041424.31edb781@posting.google.com> <btbcc0$qri$5@titan.btinternet.com> <3ff969fe$1@epflnews.epfl.ch> <ZjfKb.74347$by2.859190@wagner.videotron.net> <3ffa73fa$1@epflnews.epfl.ch> Reply-To: "Franz Heymann" <franz.heymann@btopenworld.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: dial81-135-10-24.in-addr.btopenworld.com X-Trace: hercules.btinternet.com 1073416448 18265 81.135.10.24 (6 Jan 2004 19:14:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: news-complaints@lists.btinternet.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2004 19:14:08 +0000 (UTC) X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Priority: 3 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165