🚀 go-pugleaf

"Harry" <harald.vanlintel@epfl.ch> wrote in message news:<400cefe7$1@epflnews.epfl.ch>...
> "Sergey Karavashkin" <selftrans@yandex.ru> wrote in message
> news:a42650fc.0401191437.384c3447@posting.google.com...
> > "Harry" <harald.vanlintel@epfl.ch> wrote in message
>  news:<4003ff4f$1@epflnews.epfl.ch>...
> > > "Bilge" <dubious@radioactivex.lebesque-al.net> wrote in message
> > > news:slrnc06a45.8e.dubious@radioactivex.lebesque-al.net...
> > > > Harry:
> > > >  >
> > > >  >"Bilge" <dubious@radioactivex.lebesque-al.net> wrote in message
> > > >  >news:slrnbvraov.dan.dubious@radioactivex.lebesque-al.net...
>  
[snip]
 
> Sergey,
> In fact we were on a side subject, after I tried to make clear that being
> open-minded is not the same as being a crackpot..
> Ampere's law is more complete than Lorentz', and seems to be not fully
> compatible with Maxwell's.
> Just when I expected Bilge to actually show me that all forces are balanced
> due to something that I overlooked, he became silent.
> What is according to you the reaction of a current carrying wire to a moving
> charge?
> 
> Harald


Dear Harald, you really found in Bilge a person from whom you can
expect a reasonable answer! Bilge knows only refrain to a prayer
"Einstein Akbar!" ;-)

I understand your wish to catch the dragoon's tail, but the tail is in
other side. You and me, we many times discussed this issue, and you
had not one case to make sure, you cannot make an independent step on
this way. Not because your knowledge is insufficient. Simply to make
this step is not so simple. One thing I understood, I have not to
delete our paper from site. And this is already good. ;-)

And as to Ampere's law, I already wrote you in my previous letter.

Kind regards,

Sergey.