Article View: sci.physics
Article #15341. Karavashkin's Nobel .
From: Jeff Relf
Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2004 03:30
Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2004 03:30
52 lines
3389 bytes
3389 bytes
Hi Mark Martin ,
Re: Sergey Karavashkin's idea that a planet might
be formed from something similar to sun spots ,
You comment ,
" With no subsequent delta-V an ejectile at
less than escape velocity will follow
a ballistic trajectory which brings it
right back into the Sun "
Right , but I think Sergey's idea was that
some stars might be spinning so fast that
a particular kind of " sun spot " would be
enough to reach the escape velocity .
Remember , he's suggesting that the heat and compression
inside a planet or star creates a new state of matter
which is positively charged locally ,
but negatively charged outside the planet or star .
I also think he's saying that the magnetic nature of
sunspots and the sun itself help explain how
The ejected matter would then form stable orbits ,
creating something like " Quanta " ... i.e. planets .
( But I could be wrong about that )
It's a very interesting idea ,
but I don't know how to confirm that observationally .
Re: That refinement to general and special relativity :
" The laws of physics , including the speed of light ,
are the same regardless of one's hypothetical scale .
Where :
_ Space , time , and heat are all scaled .
_ Heat is fundamentally random mass-energy .
_ It's always one's incomplete information
that causes any apparent randomness . "
You observe ,
" It's only a refinement at long last if
it happens to pan out observationally .
Does it ? "
Yes it does in fact ...
And I'll soon be getting my Nobel .
And when I do ,
I'll buy everyone here a round of drinks .
No , seriously , I haven't thought it through that much .
but we'll know it's true if Karavashkin gets a Nobel .
But this is exactly the kind of thing that
I like to think about .
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<cw1lgktk5jwj.dlg@x.Jeff.Relf>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!66-109-205-164.ncplus.NET!not-for-mailReferences:
<a42650fc.0402011436.70900971@posting.google.com> <1cz63pwj40o8r.dlg@x.Jeff.Relf> <7d087978.0402021106.773764c2@posting.google.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f74ae,257b2f4cf54a66dc
X-Google-Attributes: gidf74ae,public
X-Google-Thread: 106ae0,257b2f4cf54a66dc
X-Google-Attributes: gid106ae0,public
X-Google-Thread: 10b271,257b2f4cf54a66dc
X-Google-Attributes: gid10b271,public
X-Google-Thread: 1110fe,257b2f4cf54a66dc
X-Google-Attributes: gid1110fe,public
X-Google-Thread: 1038c2,257b2f4cf54a66dc
X-Google-Attributes: gid1038c2,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2004-02-02 19:30:13 PST
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!66-109-205-164.ncplus.NET!not-for-mail
From: Jeff Relf <Me@Privacy.NET>
Newsgroups: sci.physics,sci.astro,sci.physics.electromag,alt.sci.physics.new-theories,fj.sci.matter
Subject: . Karavashkin's Nobel .
Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2004 19:30:23 -0800
Lines: 52
Message-ID: <cw1lgktk5jwj.dlg@x.Jeff.Relf>
References: <a42650fc.0402011436.70900971@posting.google.com> <1cz63pwj40o8r.dlg@x.Jeff.Relf> <7d087978.0402021106.773764c2@posting.google.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 66-109-205-164.ncplus.net (66.109.205.164)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: news.uni-berlin.de 1075779011 31571059 66.109.205.164 ([177113])
User-Agent: 40tude_Dialog/2.0.10.1
X-Face: V|9[5IY]/OB15+<DlkA6*rsaeJb?9HnEE@[CAy1koT:N4Ew'*#35g{6z1>}/e:m!6.qw'Kzn@$#""CJQl/Uv"R,&G?sNO"{#LEEnS3lQRnT#Ql#'3ySQ80}u7Q<`+B@;Y;81AnK'_PD^fm.3T/<-i~YdZ%Q}b?:-]{Lr#s6.N,r(}
X-Newsreader: Win98 C++