Re: paradox in quantum mechanics

Article View: sci.physics

Article #15352

#15352

From: robert j. kolker
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 14:48

13 lines
1469 bytes

Eugene Shubert wrote:

> References please. I'm certain that Newton thought of light as a
> particle.

He ultimately did. But he toyed around with aetheric theories along the 
same line as Descartes but ultimately rejected them because they did not 
fit the facts. Newton took Descartes very seriously and spent several 
years showing Descartes apporach was unfruitful.

Bob Kolker

Technical Details

Message-ID: <2tq0haF22go9aU3@uni-berlin.de>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!not-for-mail

References: <6583e4ad.0410202221.4cef5d4a@posting.google.com> <4177cb90@sys13.hou.wt.net>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Thread: 10b271,51a88b2f6f5a42f9
X-Google-Thread: 103d8c,51a88b2f6f5a42f9
X-Google-Thread: fa4c1,51a88b2f6f5a42f9
X-Google-Thread: 114713,51a88b2f6f5a42f9
X-Google-Attributes: gid10b271,gid103d8c,gidfa4c1,gid114713,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!not-for-mail
From: "robert j. kolker" <nowhere@nowhere.net>
Newsgroups: sci.physics,de.sci.physik,fr.sci.physique,fj.sci.physics
Subject: Re: paradox in quantum mechanics
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 10:48:10 -0400
Lines: 14
Message-ID: <2tq0haF22go9aU3@uni-berlin.de>
References: <6583e4ad.0410202221.4cef5d4a@posting.google.com> <4177cb90@sys13.hou.wt.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: news.uni-berlin.de kpD85NzgTVid7VWcbUblBAsXMA4/cirCRsk42Zy3ml1vA3BzE=
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
In-Reply-To: <4177cb90@sys13.hou.wt.net>

Reply to Parent Message