Article View: sci.physics
Article #15372Re: Salaries of US Scientists Drop
From: jmfbahciv
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2003 12:04
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2003 12:04
33 lines
2546 bytes
2546 bytes
In article <bpqq5u$r7e$1@newsserver.rrzn.uni-hannover.de>, Roland Franzius <roland.franzius@uos.de> wrote: >jmfbahciv@aol.com wrote: > >> In article <e58d56ae.0311230725.5143a4a0@posting.google.com>, >> whopkins@csd.uwm.edu (Alfred Einstead) wrote: >> >>>jspub2003@yahoo.com (jsp) wrote: >>> >>>>During the past two years, the salaries of >>>>most scientists including physicists have decreased significantly. >>> >>>Too much supply, not enough demand. >> >> >> How am I supposed to read this datum? 1. Every employed scientist >> has received a pay cut. 2. Starting salaries have decreased; but >> starting salaries for what? 3. The salaries of jobs transforming >> dirt into gold are averaged in with the medical biochem jobs causing >> the average for biochem to drop and the average for dirt-to-gold >> to rise? > >Consider the averaged effect made up by ten physicists with salaries of >10^6$/a fired or retired. Then it's a sly statistic engineered to have the reader come to an incorrect solution so that [what?] they vote for Democrats next year? What is the hidden agenda behind the claim? /BAH Subtract a hundred and four for e-mail.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<bpt017$ept$1@bob.news.rcn.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newshosting.com!news-xfer2.atl.newshosting.com!diablo.voicenet.com!rcn!feed3.news.rcn.net!208-59-181-143References:
<f2fbd428.0311230201.4a7975c5@posting.google.com> <e58d56ae.0311230725.5143a4a0@posting.google.com> <bpqkeg$omk$4@bob.news.rcn.net> <bpqq5u$r7e$1@newsserver.rrzn.uni-hannover.de>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: fa4c1,23666a2ad34806dd X-Google-Attributes: gidfa4c1,public X-Google-Thread: 114713,23666a2ad34806dd X-Google-Attributes: gid114713,public X-Google-Thread: 10b271,23666a2ad34806dd X-Google-Attributes: gid10b271,public X-Google-Thread: f442a,23666a2ad34806dd X-Google-Attributes: gidf442a,public X-Google-Thread: 103d8c,23666a2ad34806dd X-Google-Attributes: gid103d8c,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-11-24 05:12:01 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newshosting.com!news-xfer2.atl.newshosting.com!diablo.voicenet.com!rcn!feed3.news.rcn.net!208-59-181-143 From: jmfbahciv@aol.com Newsgroups: sci.physics,de.sci.physik,fr.sci.physique,alt.sci.physics,fj.sci.physics Subject: Re: Salaries of US Scientists Drop Date: Mon, 24 Nov 03 12:04:45 GMT Organization: UltraNet Communications, Inc. Lines: 33 Message-ID: <bpt017$ept$1@bob.news.rcn.net> References: <f2fbd428.0311230201.4a7975c5@posting.google.com> <e58d56ae.0311230725.5143a4a0@posting.google.com> <bpqkeg$omk$4@bob.news.rcn.net> <bpqq5u$r7e$1@newsserver.rrzn.uni-hannover.de> X-Trace: UmFuZG9tSVZ56ivV+6jwhOnCn3Vg49wkTXNt4TQvOIx/PdPURYRFpcSJ1dSQheXy X-Complaints-To: abuse@rcn.com NNTP-Posting-Date: 24 Nov 2003 13:11:03 GMT X-Newsreader: News Xpress Version 1.0 Beta #4