🚀 go-pugleaf

There is no need for imaginary matter - space is filled with neutrino
gas. Neutrino gas forms a statistical ensemble which is different from
normal gases. Formulating the respective partition function gives the
possibility to study the neutrino gas as an ideal gas with k = 3. This
gas has interesting properties: in vacuum, those properties are
described with Maxwell equations for vacuum. In the continuums within
matter, the problem becomes more complex, but valid mathematics
exists. More can be found on www.evolus.org - several download files
introducing the theory of Neutrino Gases - Evolutionary Physics - the
Theory of Everything.

Best regards
Willie

On Mon, 17 Jan 2000 21:14:24 +0900, "Tomohide Sonoda" <tomo@besci.com>
wrote:

>Mark Fergerson wrote in message <388248D2.518FF0E2@home.com>...
>>Tomohide Sonoda wrote:
>>> In the present, strong interaction, weak interaction, EM and gravity
>exist.
>>> But I think we have to think about new one if we admit that extremes.
>>
>>  That was kinda my point. I was referring to the "Unification
>>Energies" of the so-called four fundamental forces (superseded by
>>string theory variants, but still true). Ignore the next paragraph if
>>you already know what I'm talking about.
>>
> I'm still studying about the problems you pointed out, so I can't answer
>all of yours.
>But there is the suggestion though it is under constructing and rough one.
>Please ignore next if you don't like rough theory.
>
> To solve the unification energies problem, it will be useful to introduce
>the "imaginary
>matter". That matter is represented by imaginary unit i. And it fills the
>universe. But we can't see, feel and measure because it's an "imaginary"
>matter.  Also we can say imaginary matter is a medium of light. But the
>Michelson-Morley's experiments can't deny the imaginary matter because it's
>not a real one.
> Imagine that imaginary matter is  fluids and fills the universe. If we
>assume that the imaginary matter is an ideal fluid, according to the
>Lagrange's vortex theorem, the vorticity is conserved if the first state of
>the imaginary matter is rotational flow. Then assume that energy E is
>created according to E=h*nu where h is Planck constant and nu is frequency
>of the imaginary matter. I think that created energy sustains the universe
>and is the basement of all forces.
> Also we can understand the reason why the Schroedinger equation must be
>complex. Though it is said it represents probability wave, we can say that
>represent the wave of imaginary matter because we assume that imaginary
>matter is represented i.
>
>
>
>>  We _must_ take extremes into account; that's where we find the
>>limits of our knowledge and learn new things.
>
>I think we must follow the nature. If the nature shows the facts, we must
>obey it.
>Though I'm not sure whether there are extremes or not.
>
> The graph based on the facts value. So if we admit that the graph shows the
>truth, we must reconstruct the theories to fit the truth.
>
>Tomohide Sonoda
>
>http://www.besci.com/
>(The Graph of the Univese)
>
>
>
>------
>Posted via news://freenews.netfront.net
>Complaints to news@netfront.net