🚀 go-pugleaf

Mark Fergerson wrote in message <388248D2.518FF0E2@home.com>...
>Tomohide Sonoda wrote:
>> In the present, strong interaction, weak interaction, EM and gravity
exist.
>> But I think we have to think about new one if we admit that extremes.
>
>  That was kinda my point. I was referring to the "Unification
>Energies" of the so-called four fundamental forces (superseded by
>string theory variants, but still true). Ignore the next paragraph if
>you already know what I'm talking about.
>
 I'm still studying about the problems you pointed out, so I can't answer
all of yours.
But there is the suggestion though it is under constructing and rough one.
Please ignore next if you don't like rough theory.

 To solve the unification energies problem, it will be useful to introduce
the "imaginary
matter". That matter is represented by imaginary unit i. And it fills the
universe. But we can't see, feel and measure because it's an "imaginary"
matter.  Also we can say imaginary matter is a medium of light. But the
Michelson-Morley's experiments can't deny the imaginary matter because it's
not a real one.
 Imagine that imaginary matter is  fluids and fills the universe. If we
assume that the imaginary matter is an ideal fluid, according to the
Lagrange's vortex theorem, the vorticity is conserved if the first state of
the imaginary matter is rotational flow. Then assume that energy E is
created according to E=h*nu where h is Planck constant and nu is frequency
of the imaginary matter. I think that created energy sustains the universe
and is the basement of all forces.
 Also we can understand the reason why the Schroedinger equation must be
complex. Though it is said it represents probability wave, we can say that
represent the wave of imaginary matter because we assume that imaginary
matter is represented i.



>  We _must_ take extremes into account; that's where we find the
>limits of our knowledge and learn new things.

I think we must follow the nature. If the nature shows the facts, we must
obey it.
Though I'm not sure whether there are extremes or not.

 The graph based on the facts value. So if we admit that the graph shows the
truth, we must reconstruct the theories to fit the truth.

Tomohide Sonoda

http://www.besci.com/
(The Graph of the Univese)



------
Posted via news://freenews.netfront.net
Complaints to news@netfront.net