🚀 go-pugleaf

On Aug 12, 9:35 am, Koobee Wublee <koobee.wub...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Aug 10, 8:05 am, "hanson" <han...@quick.net> wrote:
>
> > Andro declared "Aetherial " victory,
> > and danced to hanson's chachacha
>
> Androcles the nitwit, the plagiarist, and the Aether-denier can
> fantasize whatever he wants.  The bottom line is that the Aether is
> all around us.  It must exist if you accept electromagnetism.  <shrug>
>
> Denial of the Aether is stupid and suits no purpose in any scientific
> discussions.  <shrug>  Trying to sell bottles full of the Aether is
> also absurd since Androcles still does not understand what role the
> Aether plays in his everyday life.  <shrug>
>
> Oh, well, in his denial of the Aether, either Androcles is blind of
> the truth or unable to understand electromagnetism.   In either case,
> he is a merely a moron.  <shrug>
>
> No one shall deny the existence of the Aether.  <shrug>

The dilemma: "aether - no aether" is a red herring introduced by
Einstein in 1905 that confuses both relativists and anti-rlativists
even today. It is just as harmful as the dilemma or red herring:
"massive photon - massless photon". Some day both may become true
dilemmas with important developments but for the moment the salvation
for dying physics could only come from the correct solution to the
dilemma "speed of light independent of the speed of the light source -
speed of light dependent on the speed of the light source". In 1905
Einstein made the wrong choice; it is time (if it is not too late) for
scientists to restore the truth.

Pentcho Valev
pvalev@yahoo.com