🚀 go-pugleaf

> > > Dear Yanick:  If you don't understand, you have lots of company on
> > > this news group.  I've disproved SR and GR.  To understand more, read
> > > the following links.  — NoEinstein —
>
> > > Where Angels Fear to Fallhttp://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/1e3e4...
> > > Cleaning Away Einstein’s Mishmashhttp://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/5d847...
> > > Dropping Einstein Like a Stonehttp://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/989e1...le texte des messages précédents -
>
> > > - Afficher le texte des messages précédents -
>
> > Dear Mr NoEinstein
> > I have take of a copy (I am in a cyberspace) of your 3 links on my USB
> > key
> > I will read it (after translation) at home.
> > Thank you.
>
> > quote: "you have lots of company on this news group."
> > Do you accept Newton's vacuum space and asbsolute speed ?
> > Are you newtonist ?
> > Who is newtonist here, in this newsgroup ?
>
> > Yanick Toutain- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> Dear Yanick:  Newton was a scientist; Einstein wasn't.  Newton tried
> to verify things via experiment; Einstein had no concept of what
> experimentation is.  Einstein was a science GROUPIE.  He talked to,
> and/or corresponded with, trying-to-be-real scientists.  An astronomer
> friend told Einstein that the moons of Jupiter reappear sooner than
> their periods predict.  So, Einstein supposed that gravity was curving
> the light.  It was no great stretch to assume that a massive object
> would bend light more than a less massive one.  To test that idea,
> Einstein figured the light of a star passing behind the Sun during a
> solar eclipse would be bent an angle that is directly proportional to
> the square of the Sun's mass (taking the mass of Jupiter as unity).
> He was so ‘cock sure’ that he was right, I suspect that he had his
> astronomer friend put an opaque disk over the Sun's lumen.  That would
> enable making light bending observations any day of the year, if
> stars' light was seen through infrared filters.
>      The other points you make about relativity are all pointless.
> Varying ether flow and density is the correct cause of every
> observation in nature.  Newton made a contribution.  All Einstein did
> was to keep making guesses.  And he guessed wrong.  — NoEinstein —

The vaccum of Newton, answer to Noestein.
http://monsyte.blogspot.com/2008/07/vacuum-of-newton-answer-to-noeinstein.html


Brief answer from the cyber
I agree with the beginning of your text.
500 seconds after the emission of its image, no on know WHERE IS THE
SUN.
The image show us where the Sun WAS 500 seconds before.
Idem for Mercure.

Brève réponse depuis le cyber
je suis d'accord avec le début de votre texte.
500 secondes après l'émission son image, personne ne sait OU EST LE
SOLEIL.
L'image nous montre où était le Soleil 500 secondes avant.
idem pour Mercure.

I was reading, Newton's book "De gravitatio" yesterday in the evening.
He explain (against Descartes) that we have a true speed , an absolute
speed in relation with the VACUUM.

Je lisais le livre de Newton hier soir. De Gravitatio.
Il explique (contre Descartes) que nous avons une vraie vitesse, une
vitesse absolue par rapport au vide.

Newton agree with Democritos.
Newton est d'accord avec Democritos.

Go and read Principia and De gravitatio.
Retournez lire les Principia et De la Gravitation

We will struggle together with the true theory of Newton against the
swindlers.
Nous lutterons ensemble contre les escrocs.


Have you read my text about Michelson and his mirrors
http://monsyte.blogspot.com/2008/07/les-miroirs-de-michelsonune-analyse.html
translation in English:
http://fr.babelfish.yahoo.com/translate_url?doit=done&tt=url&intl=1&fr=bf-res&trurl=http%3A%2F%2Fmonsyte.blogspot.com%2F2008%2F07%2Fles-miroirs-de-michelsonune-analyse.html&lp=fr_en&btnTrUrl=Traduire


Yours for the materialist scientific revolution
Yanick Toutain