🚀 go-pugleaf

On 20 avr, 12:28, uri <dann...@bezeqint.net> wrote:
> Is it possible to disprove phenomenalism?
>
> In epistemology and the philosophy of perception, phenomenalism is the
> view that physical objects do not exist as things in themselves but
> only as perceptual phenomena or sensory stimuli (e.g. redness,
> hardness, softness, sweetness, etc.) situated in time and in space. In
> particular, phenomenalism reduces talk about physical objects in the
> external world to talk about bundles of sense-data. Phenomenalism is a
> radical form of empiricism and, hence, its roots as an ontological
> view of the nature of existence can be traced back to George Berkeley
> and his subjective idealism, which David Hume further elaborated.

Frequently I ama not sute to understand what the redactors of
sci.physics wrote

But here, I am sure !

VI Lénine have written an entire book against Malinovsky  - Bogdanov,
against Mach, against Avenarius ... against Berkeley.
Materislism and empiriociriticism.

He defended Newton, the absolute speed,the absolute time,the absolute
motion in a universe where "physical objects exist as things in
themselves".

I defend Lénine and Newton since 2001 on the web.

But I am waiting for the the first one who will say : I understand all
the main theories of Newton and I want towork serieously to examin the
six way I have discovered to prove our absolute 'objective) motion.

Take a look on my
"manifeste matérialiste"
and "la véritable équation de la gravitation hélioplanétaire.
I just have written a text about the main questions of the motion and
the space.
http://monsyte.blogspot.com/2008/04/newton-les-vitesses-et-la-philosophie.html
I have asked Mr valev "what do youcall "speed" bit he prefers to be
the first.
He hopes to discover something and to be the king of the world.

Thank you mr Uri
Go on

salutations matérialistes
Yanick Toutain
Everyone must read the chapter on the absolute time !
http://marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1908/mec/index.htm