🚀 go-pugleaf

On 25 Aug, 11:49, "Dirk Van de moortel" <dirkvandemoor...@ThankS-NO-
SperM.hotmail.com> wrote:
> "Pmb" <some...@somewhere.net> wrote in messagenews:iO2dnTMs84Au-lLbnZ2dnUVZ_g6dnZ2d@comcast.com...
>
> > "Dirk Van de moortel" <dirkvandemoor...@ThankS-NO-SperM.hotmail.com> wrote
> > in messagenews:AbCzi.69371$re7.1943753@phobos.telenet-ops.be...
>
> >> "Pmb" <some...@somewhere.net> wrote in message
> >>news:SYSdnbH9rLdudFPbnZ2dnUVZ_h-vnZ2d@comcast.com...
>
> >>> "Dirk Van de moortel" <dirkvandemoor...@ThankS-NO-SperM.hotmail.com>
> >>> wrote in messagenews:rjBzi.69303$IS1.1671200@phobos.telenet-ops.be...
>
> >>>> "Pmb" <some...@somewhere.net> wrote in message
> >>>>news:GeGdnTQOHsEDTFPbnZ2dnUVZ_gidnZ2d@comcast.com...
>
> >>>>> "Dirk Van de moortel" <dirkvandemoor...@ThankS-NO-SperM.hotmail.com>
> >>>>> wrote in messagenews:_Nzzi.69172$ve7.1947853@phobos.telenet-ops.be...
>
> >>>>>> "qbit" <q...@quantumworldz.com> wrote in message
> >>>>>>news:famg2r$lg5$1@aioe.org...
> >>>>>>> FACT #1:
> >>>>>>>  A photon emitted at the Earth surface (ignoring air-resistance) and
> >>>>>>> going up vertically into the space is SLOWER than a photon
> >>>>>>>  going straightforward in vacuum space; ie. slower than c.
> >>>>>>>  Reason: attraction by the Earth gravity.
>
> >>>>>> Some of us could make some very interesting and relatively
> >>>>>> subtle remarks about this statement, and no doubt some of
> >>>>>> us already did just that in the past, when you were using one
> >>>>>> of your previous identities. Your evidently arrogant attitude of
> >>>>>> refusal and inability to learn prohibited you to do anything
> >>>>>> useful with the responses and remarks given to you.
> >>>>>> So, apart from the negative attention you new get, what
> >>>>>> makes you stick around, other than some kind of sick
> >>>>>> masochism, and what makes you think that people should
> >>>>>> waste their time trying to help and educate an unwilling,
> >>>>>> ignorant, and obviously less gifted person you like you?
>
> >>>>>> Dirk Vdm
>
> >>>>> Hi Dirk
>
> >>>>> Do you see a problem with his post? Can you share that with me? I don't
> >>>>> see any problem.
>
> >>>> I you carefully read my comment (perhaps a few times),
> >>>> you should realize that I see a severe problem with the
> >>>> *person* :-)
>
> >>>> Dirk Vdm
>
> >>> I know you have a problem with the *person*. That's obvious. I was
> >>> wondering if you had a problem with the physics?
>
> >> Perhaps you should read the first sentence of my original
> >> comment a few more times :-)
>
> >> Dirk Vdm
>
> > Yup. All I can find about your objection to the post is this
>
> > "Some of us could make some very interesting and relatively subtle remarks
> > about this statement.."
>
> > However I don't see an obvious error in that statement.
>
> I said that some of us could make some very interesting and
> relatively subtle remarks about this statement. That does
> not imply that are errors in the statement. That probably is
> because you (with your physics background) make some
> implicit assumptions about the wording of the statement, which
> the OP (as a higschool kid without the proper context) does
> not make. This happens all the time here, as you well know.
>
> > I know there is a
> > variability if iin photon speed with height. He may have got it backwards in
> > that the photon is slowing down as it leaves the field. Is this what you
> > were refering to Dirk?
>
> No.
> Why don't you have another guess?
> Hint: there are two interesting and subtle remarks to be made.
> One remark is sligtly relevant, the other is highy relevant and
> in fact essential. In your other replies on this thread you
> consistently forget to mention it. I can imagine that the other
> contextless posters are (and will probably remain forever)
> confused by this.

Moortel Moortel only a few years ago your idiocies were still
extremely efficient - your brothers even regarded you as a powerful
hypnotist, not just a silly zombie. Things change quickly don't they
Moortel Moortel.

Pentcho Valev