🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: sci.physics
Article #16006

Re: A second "big bang"

#16006
From: Ole D. Rughede
Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2003 11:56
49 lines
3514 bytes
In <e58d56ae.0302041421.1a0f6391@posting.google.com>, whopkins@csd.uwm.edu (Alfred Einstead) writes:
>Green Dehydrated Amphibian <GDA@dragon.ch> wrote:
>> 1915: Albert Einstein proposes the theory of general relativity, which
>> equates gravity to the curvature of space-time. 
>
>Technically, this is not what General Relativity does.  You can
>also equate gravity with the curvature of space-time in Newtonian
>Physics.  The structure is different: a 1-dimensional fibre bundle
>with a 3-dimensional fibre.
>
>What distinguishes General Relativity is NOT that it unifies
>gravity and space-time curvature (since the unification is also
>done with Newtonian gravity), but that it unifies it in the
>setting of a Lorentzian manifold.
>
>Even more to the point: even in Newtonian Physics, there will
>still be a Big Bang Universe.
>
>The existence of a Big Bang universe has nothing per se to do
>with Relativity.  It comes from the simple logic of answering
>the childhood question "why doesn't everything fall to the ground?"
>(which, in adult terms, is rendered as "why doesn't everything
>fall into each other?").
>
>No matter where you start or what point of view you take, there
>are only 4 alternatives.  Either
>     (1) Everything IS falling into each other (or is about to
>         start doing so)
>     (2) Everything is flying apart from one another
>     (3) Everything is in universal rotation
>or
>     (4) Gravity behaves different at long distances.
>
>Not(4) implies (1) or (2) or (3).  Not (4) and not (3) imply (1) or (2).
>And not (4), not (3) and not (2) imply (1).


Where to should everything be falling, flying, or rotating as the
result of some big bang, - or to enable some big bang?

Which kind of logic correlates "everything" or "the movement of
everything" with the idea of a "big bang"? - Some war-movies?
Childish observation of a seagull's droppings in free fall?

Are we talking about an im- or exploding "big bang", or perhaps
about several minor/major/average such or what "bangs" created
by which great bang-man?

Ole D. Rughede
Technical Details
Message-ID: <3e7c4f5e$0$119$edfadb0f@dtext02.news.tele.dk>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!not-for-mail
References: <b1njmo$bsd$1@slb3.atl.mindspring.net> <3E3F6FB9.6020303@hotmail.NOSPAM.com> <xaK%9.26458$ZE1.557225@news1.nokia.com> <3E3F79EB.8F5B1796@nic.or.kr> <e58d56ae.0302041421.1a0f6391@posting.google.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 10384c,830f5d0cde7d55f
X-Google-Attributes: gid10384c,public
X-Google-Thread: f74ae,3df8337c8f392688
X-Google-Attributes: gidf74ae,public
X-Google-Thread: 10f545,3df8337c8f392688
X-Google-Attributes: gid10f545,public
X-Google-Thread: 10b271,5ef568b8af139a7,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid10b271,public
X-Google-Thread: 111645,3df8337c8f392688
X-Google-Attributes: gid111645,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-03-22 03:56:14 PST
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.physics,sci.astro,sci.physics.relativity,fr.sci.astrophysique,alt.alien.visitors
From: ole.rughede@privat.dk (Ole D. Rughede)
Subject: Re: A second "big bang"
Reply-To: ole.rughede@privat.dk
Organization: IBM TCP/IP for OS/2  RTP, NC
References: <b1njmo$bsd$1@slb3.atl.mindspring.net> <3E3F6FB9.6020303@hotmail.NOSPAM.com> <xaK%9.26458$ZE1.557225@news1.nokia.com> <3E3F79EB.8F5B1796@nic.or.kr> <e58d56ae.0302041421.1a0f6391@posting.google.com>
X-Newsreader: IBM NewsReader/2 2.0
Distribution: world
Date: 22 Mar 2003 11:56:14 GMT
Lines: 50
Message-ID: <3e7c4f5e$0$119$edfadb0f@dtext02.news.tele.dk>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 80.163.17.43
X-Trace: 1048334174 dtext02.news.tele.dk 119 80.163.17.43
X-Complaints-To: abuse@post.tele.dk