Article View: sci.physics
Article #16020Re: A second "big bang"
From: Mark Folsom
Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2003 00:09
Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2003 00:09
44 lines
3046 bytes
3046 bytes
"Spaceman" <agentspaceman@aol.combination> wrote in message news:Z9U0a.26860$vm2.12917@rwcrnsc54... > "Mark Folsom" <folsomman@prodigy.com> wrote in message news:v4832v16d2mu4a@corp.supernews.com... > > Because there isn't any evidence that the speed of light changes, and there > > are lots of experiments that seem to show that it doesn't change. > > Nope, > lots's of ignorant "time travel dupes" that never actually refuse to find out that it can change. > How fast is light through water? Depends on the wavelength--about 2.25e8 m/s. What does that have to do with the speed of light changing over time? > > > > How much > > do you think the speed of light has changed--just enough to make the > > universe less than 10,000 years old? > > It's speed in one medium does change, > although it takes a lot of that medium to show the change. Please cite your evidence that the speed of light in water changes with time, all else remaining equal. > Water is one that shows such! > > and, > The light's speed speed has not even been proven til you actually > go far out there and.... > "turn on a light and time it's motion from point A to point B." > and without a clock on the photon! > <LOL> > > Light's actual speed in outerspace has never been measured in such a way, > It has "just been accepted" without actual facts. You can measure the speed of light by watching the orbits of the moons of Jupiter. Is that far enough out there? Mark Folsom
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<v48jk74qn0kj55@corp.supernews.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-01!sn-post-01!supernews.com!corp.supernews.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<b1njmo$bsd$1@slb3.atl.mindspring.net> <3E3F6FB9.6020303@hotmail.NOSPAM.com> <xaK%9.26458$ZE1.557225@news1.nokia.com> <3E3F79EB.8F5B1796@nic.or.kr> <JJQ0a.42784$jM5.108252@newsfeeds.bigpond.com> <v47nmfjb1fhke9@corp.supernews.com> <b20u0b$pe8$1@slb9.atl.mindspring.net> <v4832v16d2mu4a@corp.supernews.com> <Z9U0a.26860$vm2.12917@rwcrnsc54>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10384c,830f5d0cde7d55f X-Google-Attributes: gid10384c,public X-Google-Thread: 111645,3df8337c8f392688 X-Google-Attributes: gid111645,public X-Google-Thread: 10b271,3df8337c8f392688 X-Google-Attributes: gid10b271,public X-Google-Thread: f74ae,3df8337c8f392688 X-Google-Attributes: gidf74ae,public X-Google-Thread: 10f545,3df8337c8f392688 X-Google-Attributes: gid10f545,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-02-07 16:26:31 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-01!sn-post-01!supernews.com!corp.supernews.com!not-for-mail From: "Mark Folsom" <folsomman@prodigy.com> Newsgroups: sci.physics,sci.astro,sci.physics.relativity,fr.sci.astrophysique,alt.alien.visitors Subject: Re: A second "big bang" Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2003 16:09:19 -0800 Organization: Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com Message-ID: <v48jk74qn0kj55@corp.supernews.com> Reply-To: "Mark Folsom" <folsomman@prodigycom> References: <b1njmo$bsd$1@slb3.atl.mindspring.net> <3E3F6FB9.6020303@hotmail.NOSPAM.com> <xaK%9.26458$ZE1.557225@news1.nokia.com> <3E3F79EB.8F5B1796@nic.or.kr> <JJQ0a.42784$jM5.108252@newsfeeds.bigpond.com> <v47nmfjb1fhke9@corp.supernews.com> <b20u0b$pe8$1@slb9.atl.mindspring.net> <v4832v16d2mu4a@corp.supernews.com> <Z9U0a.26860$vm2.12917@rwcrnsc54> X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-Complaints-To: abuse@supernews.com Lines: 46