Article View: sci.physics
Article #16023Re: A second "big bang"
From: Spaceman
Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2003 00:59
Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2003 00:59
67 lines
3353 bytes
3353 bytes
"Mark Folsom" <folsomman@prodigy.com> wrote in message news:v48kpl4rfpokdb@corp.supernews.com... > In a vacuum it's true that it's independent of wavelength. Do you have any > evidence that it isn't? Yes, 1c+1c=2c. Still don't get it huh? independant light speed is a joke. and getting more funny to more people. > Wow, what a childish idiot! Nope, a guy that "Gets it" and you don't because you refuse to even try and find out why all because you are too busy worshipping "a clock god". > Then why did you inject your bullshit into this exchange, which was about > the change of the speed of light over time. Because "time can not change anything" something else would have to change the light's speed. "not time" > Actually, I don't think you did in that last post. > > > and that the relative speeds create differences in wavelengths. > > HENCE > > no "constant" c to all. > > In a vacuum, it is. It is not. and It can not be, (c to all) (c to all) is "magical bullshit". any motion kills c to all. 1c+1c=2c, not c 0.6c+0.6c =1.2 c. 0.5000000000000000000000000001 + 0.5000000000000000000000000001 = 1.0000000000000000000000000002 get it yet? It's only basic addition of speeds. and "is not wrong". > Tell me, please, how c was used in measuring distances to the moons of > Jupiter. First you tell me how the distances were measured at all. <LOL> still refuse to get it huh? > Wow, what a childish idiot! Nope, again, just someone who gets it when you "refuse" to.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<MDY0a.22395$2H6.713@sccrnsc04>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!wn11feed!worldnet.att.net!204.127.198.203!attbi_feed3!attbi.com!sccrnsc04.POSTED!not-for-mailReferences:
<b1njmo$bsd$1@slb3.atl.mindspring.net> <3E3F6FB9.6020303@hotmail.NOSPAM.com> <xaK%9.26458$ZE1.557225@news1.nokia.com> <3E3F79EB.8F5B1796@nic.or.kr> <JJQ0a.42784$jM5.108252@newsfeeds.bigpond.com> <v47nmfjb1fhke9@corp.supernews.com> <b20u0b$pe8$1@slb9.atl.mindspring.net> <v4832v16d2mu4a@corp.supernews.com> <Z9U0a.26860$vm2.12917@rwcrnsc54> <v48jk74qn0kj55@corp.supernews.com> <NjY0a.22719$SD6.1159@sccrnsc03> <v48kpl4rfpokdb@corp.supernews.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10384c,830f5d0cde7d55f X-Google-Attributes: gid10384c,public X-Google-Thread: 10b271,3df8337c8f392688 X-Google-Attributes: gid10b271,public X-Google-Thread: 111645,3df8337c8f392688 X-Google-Attributes: gid111645,public X-Google-Thread: 10f545,3df8337c8f392688 X-Google-Attributes: gid10f545,public X-Google-Thread: f74ae,3df8337c8f392688 X-Google-Attributes: gidf74ae,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-02-07 16:59:25 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!wn11feed!worldnet.att.net!204.127.198.203!attbi_feed3!attbi.com!sccrnsc04.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Spaceman" <agentspaceman@aol.combination> Newsgroups: sci.physics,sci.astro,sci.physics.relativity,fr.sci.astrophysique,alt.alien.visitors References: <b1njmo$bsd$1@slb3.atl.mindspring.net> <3E3F6FB9.6020303@hotmail.NOSPAM.com> <xaK%9.26458$ZE1.557225@news1.nokia.com> <3E3F79EB.8F5B1796@nic.or.kr> <JJQ0a.42784$jM5.108252@newsfeeds.bigpond.com> <v47nmfjb1fhke9@corp.supernews.com> <b20u0b$pe8$1@slb9.atl.mindspring.net> <v4832v16d2mu4a@corp.supernews.com> <Z9U0a.26860$vm2.12917@rwcrnsc54> <v48jk74qn0kj55@corp.supernews.com> <NjY0a.22719$SD6.1159@sccrnsc03> <v48kpl4rfpokdb@corp.supernews.com> Subject: Re: A second "big bang" Lines: 69 Organization: X X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Message-ID: <MDY0a.22395$2H6.713@sccrnsc04> NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.131.153.87 X-Complaints-To: abuse@attbi.com X-Trace: sccrnsc04 1044665964 24.131.153.87 (Sat, 08 Feb 2003 00:59:24 GMT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2003 00:59:24 GMT Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2003 00:59:24 GMT